...
首页> 外文期刊>The RUSI journal >Confronting Strategic Irrelevance: The End of a US-Icelandic 'Security Community'?
【24h】

Confronting Strategic Irrelevance: The End of a US-Icelandic 'Security Community'?

机译:面对战略无关性:美西“安全共同体”的终结?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Given the loss of Iceland's strategic importance, the United States has not been ready to pay the price for the political support of a small state with minuscule international influence. The backing for the Iraq war had, for example, absolutely no impact on the US decision to withdraw the fighter jets. It required the direct intervention of Lord Robertson, and a harshly worded reply from former Prime Minister Oddsson to a letter from President Bush to reverse the decision. The State Department under Colin Powell was, in contrast to other historical attempts in the 1960s and 1990s to withdraw the jets, powerless - or perhaps unwilling -to prevent it on political grounds. It seems odd that a question of four fighter jets (with supporting infrastructure, that is, five Sikorsky HH-60G search-and-rescue helicopters, two refuelling planes and radar control staff) caused so much political commotion.
机译:由于失去了冰岛的战略重要性,美国尚未准备为国际影响力很小的小国的政治支持付出代价。例如,伊拉克战争的支持对美国撤出战斗机的决定完全没有影响。它需要罗伯逊勋爵的直接干预,前总理奥德森对布什总统的一封信做出了严厉措辞,以扭转这一决定。与1960年代和1990年代的其他历史性撤军尝试相反,科林·鲍威尔(Colin Powell)领导下的美国国务院无能为力,甚至不愿出于政治理由阻止它。四架战斗机(具有支持的基础设施,即五架西科斯基HH-60G搜救直升机,两架加油机和雷达控制人员)的问题引起了如此大的政治动荡,这似乎很奇怪。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号