Reflective Knowledge: Apt Belief and Reflective Knowledge, Volume II

摘要

Throughout the more critical portion of his historical survey, Sosa examines in detail Chisholm's "givenist" foundationalism, Wittgenstein's "quietist" denial that framework beliefs are fit for skeptical inquiry at all, and Sellars's pragmatic argument that skepticism must be false if we are to be capable of action. [...] it provides one place for the interested epistemologist to go to witness a coherent statement of Sosa's varied thoughts on the role of circularity in human reasoning. -