【24h】

Reviews

机译:评论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This is not one of those 'coffee-table' books that well-meaning relatives give you for Christmas because you 'like trains'. Nor is it a product of amateurs churning out volumes that then languish in charity shops for £ 1.99 apiece. 'Disconnected'is a serious, thoroughly researched sequel to the authors' Holding the Line, published by OPC in 2012. Thus we learn how a civil servant and a respected railway journalist risked their careers by leaking details of the Serpell Report to the press, creating such a media outcry that the report's proposals were thrown to the winds. With assistance from Hansard and the National Archive Centre, the authors provide proof of the negative attitude to railways prevalent during the 1960s and '70s among civil servants and even at BRB HQ. A particular eye-opener is the comparison between the costly and counter-productive widening of the A34 Oxford-Southampton trunk road and the fate of the Didcot-Newbury-Southampton railway that could have been fettled up to carry container trains, releasing capacity via Reading.
机译:这不是好心的亲戚给你过圣诞节的那些“咖啡桌”书之一,因为你“喜欢火车”。这也不是业余爱好者制作的大量产品,然后在慈善商店苦苦挣扎,每本售价1.99英镑。 “脱节”是作者OPC在2012年出版的《持有路线》的严肃,经过深入研究的续集。因此,我们了解到公务员和受人尊敬的铁路记者如何通过向媒体泄露《 Serpell报告》的细节来冒着职业风险,引起媒体的强烈抗议,以至于报告的提议被大肆宣传。在《国会议事录》和国家档案中心的协助下,作者证明了公务员乃至BRB总部对1960年代和70年代盛行的铁路的消极态度。令人大开眼界的是A34牛津大学-南安普敦干线公路的昂贵扩建和适得其反的扩建与Didcot-Newbury-Southampton铁路的命运之间的比较,这本来可以用来运送集装箱列车,通过阅读来释放容量。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The Railway Magazine》 |2016年第1386期|26-26|共1页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 01:26:18

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号