首页> 外文期刊>The police journal >STOP AND SEARCH: DISPROPORTIONALITY, DISCRETION AND GENERALISATIONS
【24h】

STOP AND SEARCH: DISPROPORTIONALITY, DISCRETION AND GENERALISATIONS

机译:停止和搜索:不成比例,离散和广义

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

It has long been recognised that discretion is vital to good police work. However, in Britain (and many other countries), practices of discretion in the stop and search context have come under much scrutiny as it has widely been linked to racist practices, i.e. a disproportionate amount of Black and minority ethnic individuals are stopped and searched compared to White people. In a bid to counteract the discretionary practices that are seen to be linked to racist stops and searches, police officers are required (in stops and searches under section 1 of the PACE code A) to have 'reasonable grounds for suspicion'. This article evaluates what has been claimed as the tension between the required reasonable grounds for suspicion and the need to draw on generalisations (police discretion) for effective policing.
机译:长期以来,人们一直认为,谨慎对良好的警察工作至关重要。但是,在英国(和许多其他国家),在停火和搜查情况下的自由裁量做法受到了广泛的审查,因为它已与种族主义做法广泛地联系在一起,即,不成比例的黑人和少数族裔人士被停止并进行了搜查。给白人。为了抵消被认为与种族主义停止和搜查有关的酌处行为,警察必须(在PACE代码A第1节的停止和搜查中)具有“合理的怀疑依据”。本文评估了所谓的合理怀疑依据与有效推广治安的普遍性(警察自由裁量权)之间的张力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号