首页> 外文期刊>The Naval Architect >Trim Optimisation: using NavCad for prediction confidence
【24h】

Trim Optimisation: using NavCad for prediction confidence

机译:修剪优化:使用Navcad进行预测信心

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

One tool in an operator's hunt for fuel reduction is trim optimisation. Simply put, this is the setting of a ship on a waterline - different from its design waterline - that will offer a reduction in power demand and fuel consumption. It is an interesting proposition, but one that must be undertaken by both operators and designers with an appreciation for the constraints of a trimmed operation, as well as the uncertainties in the prediction of power under trimmed conditions. The first question that I would ask is "what compromises are being made if I run trimmed?" Ship operation is more than just the economics of fuel consumption. Other considerations that may prohibit trimmed operation include: 1. Reduction in visibility 2. Emergence of the propeller 3. Seakeeping, motions, or shipped water on deck 4. Underkeel clearance 5. Hull loading and strength Once it has been satisfied that these restrictions can be met, only then will it make sense to look into benefits of trimmed operation and find an optimum trim Let me first propose that there is no such thing as optimum' in naval architecture. Everything is a compromise, but we definitely can find what is 'better'.
机译:操作员搜索中的一个工具用于燃油减少是修剪优化。简单地说,这是水线上的船舶 - 与其设计水线不同 - 这将减少电力需求和燃料消耗。这是一个有趣的命题,但必须由运营商和设计师承担的一个有趣的命题,了解修剪操作的限制,以及在修剪条件下预测权力的不确定性。我询问的第一个问题是“如果我经过修剪后正在制作什么妥协?”船舶操作不仅仅是燃料消耗的经济性。可能禁止修整操作的其他考虑因素包括:1。可见性的降低2.螺旋桨的出现3.海守,动作或运输水在甲板上4.充当清除5.船体加载和强度一旦满足这些限制就可以遇到,只有那么才能调查修剪操作的好处,找到一个最佳修剪,让我第一次提出在海军架构中没有最佳的东西。一切都是一个妥协,但我们绝对可以找到“更好”的东西。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The Naval Architect》 |2020年第10期|33-34|共2页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号