首页> 外文期刊>The Lighting Journal >'WHY AREN'T WE SEEING OFFERS OF SMART CITIES AS A SERVICE AND WHY AREN'T AUTHORITIES ASKING FOR THIS?'
【24h】

'WHY AREN'T WE SEEING OFFERS OF SMART CITIES AS A SERVICE AND WHY AREN'T AUTHORITIES ASKING FOR THIS?'

机译:“为什么我们没有看到智能城市的优惠作为服务,为什么不是当局要求这件事?”

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Regarding 'smart cities', I have to question who is being 'smart'? I believe smart city technology suppliers are benefiting from passing the risk and burden of investment in infrastructure to local authorities. Local authorities should resist this and pursue alternative formats of supply.Currently in the smart cities arena it seems to me we have potential clients who are generally cash-strapped local authorities, which are not resourced to be at the cutting edge of novel technology.We have smart city technology providers; many being large, cash-rich corporations that are focused on technology.
机译:关于“智能城市”,我必须询问谁是“聪明”?我相信智能城市技术供应商从将基础设施投资的风险和投资负担到地方当局受益。地方当局应抵制这一点并追求替代供应格式。在智能城市竞技场中,它在我看来,我们有潜在的客户,他们通常是现金捆绑的地方当局,这些客户不被资源在新颖的技术的前沿。我们有智能城市科技提供商;许多是大型,现金丰富的公司,专注于技术。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The Lighting Journal》 |2020年第12期|50-50|共1页
  • 作者

    Nic Winter;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息 美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号