...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Water Law >BETWEEN THE CRACKS: WATER GOVERNANCE IN QUEENSLAND,AUSTRALIA AND POTENTIAL CUMULATIVE IMPACTS FROM MINING COAL SEAM GAS
【24h】

BETWEEN THE CRACKS: WATER GOVERNANCE IN QUEENSLAND,AUSTRALIA AND POTENTIAL CUMULATIVE IMPACTS FROM MINING COAL SEAM GAS

机译:裂缝之间:昆士兰州,澳大利亚的水管理和煤矿煤层气的潜在累积影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Ostensibly, water issues related to CSG production are now, in response to community action, within the ambit of the state's governance framework. However, as we have seen, the regulatory framework for CSG mining in Queensland gives primacy to the state's petroleum and gas legislation. The priority given to underground water rights displaces the well developed public law procedures established by the water planning framework and its protections of broader hydrological and catchment systems. The CSG regime allows unlimited volumes of water to be extracted as a result of mining activity, whilst other water users' access is capped by water planning. This undermines water planning outcomes and processes and subordinates the rights of existing water users, the rivers and the environment. As other jurisdictions have found, the regulatory framework should place CSG proponents on the same footing as other water users. This is especially so given the high level of uncertainty of information used to construct models for estimating the production of underground water and its consequential effects on other water resources. Whilst risk assessment frameworks have been adopted in NSW and other parts of Australia, these have not yet been applied in a systematic fashion in Queensland, and application is unlikely unless made mandatory or facilitated through a suitable governance framework.
机译:表面上,与CSG生产有关的水问题现在是在社区治理范围内,属于该州治理框架的范围。但是,正如我们所看到的,昆士兰州CSG开采的监管框架将州的石油和天然气立法放在首位。地下水权的优先地位取代了水规划框架及其对更广泛的水文和集水系统的保护所建立的完善的公法程序。 CSG制度允许采矿活动抽取无限量的水,而其他用水户的用水则受到水计划的限制。这破坏了水规划的结果和过程,并服从了现有用水者,河流和环境的权利。正如其他管辖区所发现的那样,监管框架应将CSG支持者置于与其他用水者相同的地位。鉴于用于构建地下水产量估算模型的信息的高度不确定性及其对其他水资源的间接影响,尤其如此。尽管新南威尔士州和澳大利亚其他地区已经采用了风险评估框架,但在昆士兰州尚未以系统的方式应用这些评估框架,除非有强制性要求或通过适当的治理框架加以促进,否则应用的可能性很小。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号