...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Navigation >Why the Eurocontrol Safety Regulation Commission Policy on Safety Nets and Risk Assessment is Wrong
【24h】

Why the Eurocontrol Safety Regulation Commission Policy on Safety Nets and Risk Assessment is Wrong

机译:为什么欧洲安全管理委员会关于安全网和风险评估的政策是错误的

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Current Eurocontrol Safety Regulation Commission (SRC) policy says that the Air Traffic Management (ATM) system (including safety minima) must be demonstrated through risk assessments to meet the Target Level of Safety (TLS) without needing to take safety nets (such as Short Term Conflict Alert) into account. This policy is wrong. The policy is invalid because it does not build rationally and consistently from ATM's firm foundations of TLS and hazard analysis. The policy is bad because it would tend to retard safety improvements. Safety net policy must rest on a clear and rational treatment of integrated ATM system safety defences. A new safety net policy, appropriate to safe ATM system improvements, is needed, which recognizes that safety nets are an integrated part of ATM system defences. The effects of safety nets in reducing deaths from mid-air collisions should be fully included in hazard analysis and safety audits in the context of the TLS for total system design.
机译:欧洲管制安全委员会(SRC)的现行政策规定,必须通过风险评估来证明空中交通管理(ATM)系统(包括安全最低要求),以达到目标安全标准(TLS),而无需使用安全网(例如术语冲突警报)。这个政策是错误的。该政策无效,因为它不是根据ATM的TLS和危害分析的坚实基础合理而一致地构建的。该政策是不好的,因为它往往会阻碍安全改进。安全网政策必须基于对集成的ATM系统安全防御的清晰合理的处理。需要一种适用于安全ATM系统改进的新安全网政策,该政策认识到安全网是ATM系统防御的组成部分。在整个系统的TLS范围内,安全网在减少空中碰撞造成的死亡方面应充分纳入危害分析和安全审核中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号