首页> 外文期刊>The engineers journal >Anyone for quality?
【24h】

Anyone for quality?

机译:有人要质量吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Quality management is not just for people who make things. Tom Donaghy writes that QM is relevant in the public, service, and construction sectors as well as in manufacturing. As someone who spends a lot of time talking to all sorts of enterprises about quality management (QM) and software tools for the job, I believe it gives me a fairly unique and impartial insight into attitudes to QM in different industries. Some industries are eager beavers while others, two in particular, appear to have a relatively ambivalent approach to QM. At the risk of offending two entire sectors in one fell swoop, these are the construction, and meat industries. Needless to say, there are exceptions, and if you are outraged by this slur, you may be in one of them. Construction tends to equate quality management with health and safety regulatory compliance and not much else, and the meat business equates QM with filling in forms and paper. I'd be in big trouble if QM had nothing more than this to offer.
机译:质量管理不仅仅针对创造事物的人。汤姆·多纳吉(Tom Donaghy)写道,质量管理与公共,服务和建筑行业以及制造业相关。作为一个花费大量时间与各种企业讨论工作的质量管理(QM)和软件工具的人,我相信它使我对不同行业对QM的态度有相当独特而公正的见解。一些行业渴望海狸,而另一些行业,尤其​​是两个行业,似乎对质量管理有相对矛盾的态度。一口气冒犯了整个两个部门的风险,那就是建筑业和肉类工业。毋庸置疑,这里有例外,如果您对这种侮辱感到愤怒,那么您可能就是其中之一。建筑业倾向于将质量管理等同于健康与安全法规合规,而其他方面则不多,而肉类业务则将质量管理等同于填写表格和纸张。如果QM仅能提供这个功能,那我将陷入很大的麻烦。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号