首页> 外文期刊>The engineers journal >Could Space Disaster Have Been Averted?
【24h】

Could Space Disaster Have Been Averted?

机译:可以避免太空灾难吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The loss of the lives of those seven astronauts caused shock and sympathy in equal measures, transcending political boundaries across the globe. The failure of a rocket is not as uncommon an occurrence in the commercial aerospace sector as it is in manned spaceflight - indeed employees here in Devtec suffered the deep disappointment of seeing the European launcher Ariane5 explode over the Atlantic in late December 2002, caused by problems in its new Vulcain2 engine on which we had designed and manufactured several components. Watching and dealing with the aftermath of such a failure is tough, but for the engineers working on manned space flight such a failure has ramifications unimaginable to commercial aerospace engineers. So what caused the accident? NASA's investigation currently suspects a hole in the left wing heat shield caused by an impact, allowed hot plasma to enter the wing, causing a loss of integrity of the wing and ultimately the loss of the orbiter itself. Did a piece of polystyrene from the fuel tank hitting either the wing leading edge or underside of the wing cause the ensuing disintegration of the shuttle during re-entry? Was it a problem with the heat shield tiles, which were regularly damaged during previous shuttle missions?
机译:那七名宇航员的生命丧生以同等的方式引起震惊和同情,超越了全球的政治界限。火箭弹的失败在载人航天中并不罕见,在商业航天领域中确实如此-实际上,Devtec的员工深感失望,因为问题导致欧洲发射器Ariane5于2002年12月下旬在大西洋爆炸。在其新的Vulcain2发动机上,我们已经在该发动机上设计并制造了多个组件。观察并处理此类故障的后果非常困难,但是对于从事载人航天飞行的工程师而言,此类故障对商业航空航天工程师而言是难以想象的后果。那么是什么原因造成了事故呢?美国宇航局的调查目前怀疑是由于撞击在左机翼隔热板上造成了一个孔,使热等离子体进入机翼,导致机翼完整性丧失,并最终导致轨道器自身损失。燃油箱中的一部分聚苯乙烯撞击机翼的前缘或机翼的下侧,是否导致航天飞机在重新进入飞机时随之解体?隔热砖是否有问题?隔热砖在以前的航天飞机飞行任务中经常损坏?

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号