首页> 外文期刊>The design journal >Generativity Revisited. Participatory Design for Self-Organization in Communities
【24h】

Generativity Revisited. Participatory Design for Self-Organization in Communities

机译:经变性重新审视。 社区的自我组织的参与式设计

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Societal trends, such as the governmental withdrawal from the public realm, increasingly motivates communities to self-organize in taking care of it. As a result, designers have explored the concept of 'generativity1 as a quality of design that supports communities in questioning, supporting and giving form to self-organization in the public realm. Nonetheless, a thorough investigation of how to enable generativity in the context of community-based participatory design (PD) is lacking. When designers give form to generativity, they intend to allow people to 'self-organize' by transforming and using infrastructures through and for debating and creating public matters, without assistance from the infrastructure's original designers. While design for informatics defines generativity with a focus on 'self'-organized processes, we conclude that generativity in the context of designing for the complex politics of the public realm is a quality that mainly supports communities' 'co'-organization. We describe the generative quality of design in the community project Betty's Garden and discuss how the specific roles and capabilities that were developed by the community and by us as researchers contributed to this quality.
机译:社会趋势,如政府退出公共领域,越来越多地激励社区来保护它。因此,设计师探讨了“发电权”的概念作为一种质量的设计质量,支持在公共领域的自我组织中询问,支持和给予形式的社区。尽管如此,缺乏对如何在基于社区的参与式设计(PD)的背景下启用发电度的彻底调查。当设计人员给予发电情,他们打算允许人们通过转换和使用基础设施来“自组织”,并辩论并创建公共事项,而没有基础设施的原始设计师的帮助。虽然为信息学的设计定义了焦点“自我组织的流程的发电,但我们得出结论,在为公共领域的复杂政治设计中的设计中,这是一个主要支持社区的”共同组织“的质量。我们描述了社区项目贝蒂的花园中的生成质量,并讨论了社区和美国作为研究人员开发的特定角色和能力如何导致这种质量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号