Have we said that lately? I can't say that we have, and yet without you - the readers, contributors, reviewers, gurus, ambassadors, stewards, mentors, critics - our journal simply would not be the same and, let's be honest, nor would it function effectively. Upfront and on centre stage in each issue are the articles that have been double-blind peer-reviewed by an international peer-review network, indeed, sometimes, the reviewing can require three or four reviews because there is contention; between the generalists and specialists, between the traditionalists and the innovators, between cultures. All-in-all, this is a good thing. Yes, it takes up time, commitment, and openness to learning but academic argument is why we're here after all, isn't it?
展开▼
