首页> 外文期刊>The China quarterly >Welfare, Wealth and Poverty in Urban China: The Dibao and Its Differential Disbursement
【24h】

Welfare, Wealth and Poverty in Urban China: The Dibao and Its Differential Disbursement

机译:中国城市的福利,财富与贫困:低保及其差异性支出

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In the broader social science literature, most studies of social protection investigate welfare in democracies, and at the national level, and typically assume that welfare is given in order to influence voting. This paper, to the contrary, considers social assistance in authoritarian China at the urban level. Its findings are compatible with an explanation that there are two dissimilar logics influencing the distributional decisions of lower-level administrators. That is, there appear to be two modes of social policy implementation, which vary with the fiscal capacity of a given city, as indicated by its average wage: Wealthier cities seem to prefer to push off the streets those viewed as unsuited to a modern city, therefore allocating a substantial proportion of their social assistance funds to them, in order to entice them to stay at home. On the other hand, poorer places seem to permit such people to work outside, in the hope that they will thus be better able to support themselves, thereby saving the city money. A data set from China's Ministry of Civil Affairs was used.
机译:在更广泛的社会科学文献中,大多数关于社会保护的研究都是在民主国家和国家一级研究福利,并且通常假设提供福利是为了影响投票。相反,本文从城市层面考虑了威权中国的社会援助。其发现与以下两种解释逻辑兼容:存在两种不同的逻辑会影响下级管理员的分配决策。也就是说,似乎有两种社会政策实施模式,具体取决于城市的平均工资,具体取决于该城市的财政能力:富裕的城市似乎更喜欢推开那些被认为不适合现代城市的街道,因此将他们大部分的社会救助资金分配给他们,以吸引他们留在家里。另一方面,较贫穷的地方似乎允许这些人在外面工作,希望他们因此能够更好地养活自己,从而节省城市的钱。使用了中国民政部的数据集。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号