首页> 外文期刊>The China quarterly >Recite and Refuse: Contemporary Chinese Prose Poetry
【24h】

Recite and Refuse: Contemporary Chinese Prose Poetry

机译:背诵与拒绝:当代中国散文诗

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

As a scholar and poet I read Nick Admussen's book with great delight, and this delight is both intellectual and literary. Prose poetry as a modern Chinese genre or non-genre has rarely been studied in its own right. Admussen's new book not only reconstructs the rhetorical-historical development of this hybrid genre in China from the Maoist period to the recent past, but also constructs an innovative theory about how to better understand the unstable nature of Chinese prose poetry both as a literary concept and a writing practice. Rather than focusing on the "form," "politics" or "content" of Chinese prose poetry, Admussen proposes to focus on "a particularly visible and visibly particular quality to its compositional process" (p. 1). This book's emphasis on "compositional process" represents a breakthrough in our reading and interpretation of post-1949 Chinese poetry. In chapter one, by examining a set of prose poems selected from vastly different contexts, Admussen reaches a new definition of this cross-generical genre: a Chinese prose poem means a compositional process of recitation and refusal. For Admussen, recitation is "different in intent, and almost always different in form" from citation. In a prose poem, the prior art of prose and other genres is transported "into the present," into a prosaic-poetic voice (p. 30). Yet recitation treats prose traditions not as a transparent tool, but only as raw materials to be worked on. A recitation of the familiar "coexists with a refusal to follow" it. Refusal means the non-identity of a prose poem with preexisting prose. The "twin movements of recitation and refusal" characterize Chinese prose poetry not as an autonomous aesthetic entity but as a compositional process. This perspective brings new light to the textual production of contemporary Chinese poetry.
机译:作为学者和诗人,我非常高兴地阅读了尼克·阿德姆森(Nick Admussen)的书,这种高兴既是知识分子的,也是文学方面的。散文诗作为现代中国体裁还是非中国体裁很少被单独研究。阿德姆森的新书不仅重构了从毛泽东时代到近代以来中国这种混合体的修辞学-历史学发展,而且构建了关于如何更好地理解中国散文诗的不稳定本质的创新理论。写作练习。阿德姆森提出,与其关注中国散文诗的“形式”,“政治”或“内容”,不如着眼于“其创作过程的一种特别明显和明显的特质”(第1页)。本书强调“构成过程”,这是我们在阅读和解释1949年后中国诗歌方面的突破。在第一章中,阿德姆森通过考察一系列选自不同背景的散文诗,对这种跨属类的诗作有了新的定义:中国散文诗是朗诵和拒绝的组成过程。对于Admussen而言,背诵与引用“在意图上有所不同,并且几乎总是在形式上有所不同”。在散文诗中,散文和其他流派的现有技术被“传到现在”,变成了散文诗般的声音(第30页)。然而,朗诵并不是将散文传统视为一种透明的工具,而只是将其视为要加工的原材料。朗读熟悉的“并存并拒绝遵循”。拒绝是指散文诗与既有散文不相同。 “背诵与拒绝的双重运动”将中国散文诗的特征不是自主的审美实体,而是一种构成过程。这种观点为当代中国诗歌的文本创作带来了新的亮点。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The China quarterly》 |2017年第231期|835-836|共2页
  • 作者

    PU WANG;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 00:42:47

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号