首页> 外文期刊>The army lawyer >'Overshift' The Unconstitutional Double Burden-Shift on Affirmative Defenses in the New Article 120
【24h】

'Overshift' The Unconstitutional Double Burden-Shift on Affirmative Defenses in the New Article 120

机译:“过度”对新《宪法》第120条中肯定性辩护的违宪双重转移

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The Fiscal Year (FY) 2006 National Defense Authorization Act employed an unprecedented strategy to combat the threatening problem of sexual assault in the military. Congress completely overhauled Article 120 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), removing "without consent" as an element of rape and other sexual assaults and opting instead to make consent and mistake of fact as to consent affirmative defenses. As an added measure, Congress took the rare step of shifting the burden of proof to the accused to prove the existence of all affirmative defenses by a preponderance of the evidence. In a final, unprecedented step, Congress shifted the burden back to the government to disprove, beyond a reasonable doubt, the existence of a defense after the accused meets his burden on the initial burden shift.
机译:2006财年《国防授权法》采用了史无前例的策略来应对军事中性攻击的威胁性问题。国会彻底修改了《统一军事司法法典》(UCMJ)第120条,取消了“未经同意”作为强奸和其他性攻击的内容,而是选择同意和事实不当作为同意的肯定性辩护。作为一项附加措施,国会采取了罕见的步骤,将举证责任转移给被告,以通过大量证据证明所有平权辩护的存在。在最后的,史无前例的步骤中,国会将负担转嫁给政府,以在无合理怀疑的情况下证明被告在最初负担转移后负担了辩护的存在。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The army lawyer》 |2007年第2007期|2-17|共16页
  • 作者

    Howard H. Hoege III;

  • 作者单位

    Criminal Law Department The Judge Advocate General's Legal Center & School Charlottesville, Virginia;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 军事;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利