首页> 外文期刊>The army lawyer >The Rise and Fall of Post-Trial-Is It Time for the Legislature to Give Us All Some Clemency?
【24h】

The Rise and Fall of Post-Trial-Is It Time for the Legislature to Give Us All Some Clemency?

机译:审判后的兴衰-立法机关现在是时候给我们所有人一些处决权了吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Though the statistics show that convening authorities grant clemency, the rate may not equal the percentage the appellate courts find are deserving of some relief.219 Much of the relief the courts of criminal appeals contemplate, however, is due to post-trial processing concerns.220 If the status quo continues, the appellate courts may be an accused's best chance for relief. A review of the post-trial process from its inception through its executive, legislative, and judicial development reveals that the process has strayed from what the drafters originally intended. The convening authority's power initially needed guarding, but as the military justice system matured, this need-along with the need for extensive post-trial convening authority involvement-has diminished. The appellate courts have shown that they are capable of dispensing justice by usurping clemency authority. Though there are cases where a convening authority may be better suited to exercise true clemency, these cases are few, and the appellate courts would be just as able. The appellate courts' frustration with the process and attempts to exert influence over the system have signaled the need for another wide-sweeping, legislative overhaul of the post-trial system.
机译:尽管统计数据显示召集当局可以宽大处理,但该比率可能不等于上诉法院认为应该减轻的百分比。219然而,刑事上诉法院考虑的大部分减轻是由于审判后处理引起的。 220如果现状继续下去,上诉法院可能是被告获得救济的最佳机会。从审判后程序的开始到执行,立法和司法发展的审查表明,该程序偏离了起草人的初衷。召集机构的权力最初需要警惕,但是随着军事司法体系的成熟,这种需求以及对广泛的审判后召集机构介入的需求已经减少。上诉法院表明,他们有能力通过篡夺宽大处理权来分配正义。尽管在某些情况下召集机构可能更适合行使真正的宽大处理,但这些案件很少,上诉法院也将具备同样的能力。上诉法院对这一程序感到沮丧,并试图对该系统施加影响,这表明需要对审判后系统进行另一轮广泛的立法改革。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号