【24h】

Letter from London

机译:伦敦来信

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

One of the questions asked in the Farrell Review of UK architecture is why housing design is not that great (I am paraphrasing). Some of it is great, of course, but much is not. Indeed most purchasers would run a mile rather than have to live in the hutches provided by companies that are essentially land speculators and marketing operations. Nick Boles, the minister who says he dislikes ugly buildings, has correctly identified mass housing estates as a problem. Unfortunately he has gone on to say that we need to put such estates on Green Belt land. Even if you think it is indeed necessary to do this (include me out), no minister of any political persuasion has told us how you avoid horribly designed developments, further enraging local communities, making them more determined to block development - even the good stuff - whenever it shows signs of making an appearance.
机译:《英国法雷尔评论》(Farrell Review of UK Architecture)中提出的问题之一是,为什么房屋设计没有那么好(我在解释)。当然,其中有些很棒,但很多都不是。的确,大多数购买者将奔跑,而不是必须忍受本质上是土地投机者和营销业务的公司提供的包the。部长尼克·鲍尔斯(Nick Boles)说,他不喜欢丑陋的建筑物,他已经正确地确定了大规模居住区是一个问题。不幸的是,他继续说,我们需要在绿带土地上放置此类遗产。即使您认为确实有必要这样做(包括我在内),也没有任何政治说服部长告诉我们如何避免设计糟糕的开发项目,进一步激怒当地社区,使他们更加坚决阻止发展-甚至是好东西-只要有出现迹象的迹象。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The architects' journal》 |2013年第1期|24-24|共1页
  • 作者

    Paul Finch;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 00:32:23

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号