首页> 外文期刊>Tertiary Education and Management >Aspired Convergence, Cherished Diversity: Dealing with the contradictions of Bologna
【24h】

Aspired Convergence, Cherished Diversity: Dealing with the contradictions of Bologna

机译:渴望融合,珍惜多样性:处理博洛尼亚的矛盾

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This article addresses the inherent tension in the Bologna process between the aim of convergence and the will to maintain the diversity of national higher education (HE) systems, as well as the decentralised and autonomous nature of national policy formulation on Bologna reforms. Starting from an analytical discussion of the concepts of convergence versus diversity in the Bologna documents, it assesses empirically the degree of convergence achieved so far between the HE systems of Germany, the Netherlands, France, and England. The result is that convergence in several dimensions was only modest between 1998 and 2004. The article concludes by reflecting upon this finding and discusses the implications. The policy proposals put forward are (1) to acknowledge and stress the merits of the Bologna process other than convergence, (2) to engage in a second round of reforms more clearly targeted at convergence, and (3) to address mobility and recognition issues independent from convergence of degree structures.
机译:本文论述了博洛尼亚进程在融合的目标和保持国家高等教育体系多样性之间的意愿之间的内在张力,以及博洛尼亚改革的国家政策制定的权力下放和自主性质。从对博洛尼亚文件中融合与多样性概念的分析讨论开始,它从经验上评估了德国,荷兰,法国和英国的高等教育系统之间迄今为止所达到的融合程度。结果是,在1998年到2004年之间,只有几个方面的趋同才是适度的。本文通过对这一发现进行总结,并讨论了其含义。提出的政策建议是(1)承认并强调博洛尼亚进程除趋同外的优点;(2)进行更明确针对趋同的第二轮改革;(3)解决流动性和承认问题独立于学位结构的收敛。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Tertiary Education and Management》 |2008年第2期|81-93|共13页
  • 作者

    Johanna Witte;

  • 作者单位

    Bavarian State Institute for Higher Education Research and Planning (IHF), Mnchen, Germany;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 13:41:47

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号