首页> 外文期刊>Television & new media >Organizing Popular Discourse with and against the Media: Notes on the Making of Narendra Modi and Recep Tayyip Erdogan as Leaders-without-Alternative
【24h】

Organizing Popular Discourse with and against the Media: Notes on the Making of Narendra Modi and Recep Tayyip Erdogan as Leaders-without-Alternative

机译:与媒体和媒体对抗组织大众话语:关于Narendra Modi和Recep Tayyip Erdogan成为领导者的说明(无替代)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article follows a comparative perspective on media narratives and practices pertaining to India's new Prime Minister Narendra Modi, previously Chief Minister of the Indian State of Gujarat, and Turkey's former Prime Minister and current President Recep Tayyip Erdoan. I argue that both have attained a current position of nearly opposition-free leadership by buttressing a people's unity of those who believe in the reliability of particular information. Modi has achieved this by successfully avoiding journalistic and legal investigation into his actions and politics ever since the mass-mediated, anti-Muslim pogrom in Gujarat 2002, supporting, instead, the people's confidence in their own capacity to identify the truth. Modi, thus, democratically procured his own intangibility. Erdoan, in contrast, is more vulnerable to democratic opposition, even though he successfully claims to provide his supporters legal and moral guidance against the historically adversarial and nationalist-secular media system and against critical information about himself.
机译:本文采用比较观点,对与印度新任总理纳伦德拉·莫迪,前印度古吉拉特邦首席总理,土耳其前总理兼现任总统雷杰普·塔伊普·埃尔多安有关的媒体叙述和做法进行比较。我认为,通过支持相信特定信息的可靠性的人民的团结,两国都达到了近乎反对派的领导地位。自2002年古吉拉特邦进行大规模介导的反穆斯林大屠杀以来,莫迪成功地避免了对他的行为和政治进行新闻和法律调查,从而实现了这一目标,取而代之的是,这支持了人们对自己查明真相的能力的信心。因此,莫迪通过民主方式获得了自己的无形资产。相比之下,埃尔多安(Erdoan)更容易受到民主反对派的影响,尽管他成功声称要向支持者提供针对历史上的对抗者和民族主义世俗媒体系统以及针对他本人的重要信息的法律和道德指导。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号