...
首页> 外文期刊>Telecommunications Reports >Supreme Court Starts Term By Rejecting Telecom Cases
【24h】

Supreme Court Starts Term By Rejecting Telecom Cases

机译:最高法院通过驳回电信案件开始开庭

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

On the first day of its 2008 term, the U.S. Supreme Court refused to grant certiorari in five telecom cases, leaving in place lower court decisions that allowed class action lawsuits to proceed against two wireless carriers, allowed a challenge of the Texas cable franchising law to proceed, upheld a ruling favorable to AT&T, Inc., in a Texas local competition proceeding, and upheld a ruling against EchoStar Corp. in a patent dispute with TiVo, Inc. T-Mobile Arbitration-Clause Cases: The court refused to review two T-Mobile USA, Inc., appeals of decisions ruling against the company's ban on class action lawsuits against the firm. The clauses are common in the arbitration portions of contracts of wireless service providers and other carriers, such as cable service providers. The high court denied two petitions for writs of certiorari filed by T-Mobile earlier this year that argued the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals (San Francisco) erred in ruling that the arbitration provisions are not enforceable and that there is no federal preemption under the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA). The cases are the latest such arbitration decisions the Supreme Court has refused to consider.
机译:在2008年任期的第一天,美国最高法院拒绝在5宗电信案件中授予证书,使地方低级法院的裁决得以进行,该裁决允许对两个无线运营商提起集体诉讼,并允许对德克萨斯州有线特许经营法提出质疑。继续,在德克萨斯州的本地竞争程序中维持有利于AT&T,Inc.的裁决,并在与TiVo,Inc.的专利纠纷中维持对EchoStar Corp.的裁决。T-Mobile仲裁条款:法院拒绝复审两个T-Mobile美国有限公司(T-Mobile USA,Inc.)对该公司禁止对公司提起集体诉讼的裁决提出上诉。这些条款在无线服务提供商和其他运营商(例如电缆服务提供商)的合同仲裁部分中很常见。高等法院于今年早些时候拒绝了T-Mobile提交的两份关于证明书请求的请愿书,该书辩称第九巡回上诉法院(旧金山)裁定仲裁条款不可执行,并且联邦没有联邦优先权仲裁法(FAA)。这些案件是最高法院拒绝考虑的最新此类仲裁决定。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号