...
首页> 外文期刊>Telecommunications Reports >Federal Court Dismisses Challenge of Section 230 EO
【24h】

Federal Court Dismisses Challenge of Section 230 EO

机译:联邦法院解雇第230届EO第230条的挑战

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia has dismissed for lack of jurisdiction the Center for Democracy & Technology's challenge of President Trump's executive order aimed at limiting Communications Decency Act section 230's liability protections for third-party content hosted or transmitted by Internet intermediaries such as Facebook, Inc., and Twitter, Inc.The court said that CDT did not have standing to challenge the executive order, which "imposes no obligation on CDT (or any other private party), but... merely directs government officials to take preliminary steps towards possible lawmaking. CDT's claimed injury is not concrete or imminent and is thus insufficient to establish Article Ⅲ standing. Even if CDT managed to clear the standing hurdle, it faces redressability and ripeness problems too," the court said. It also rejected the notion that CDT could gain standing by representing the interests of companies like Facebook and Twitter.
机译:哥伦比亚地区的美国地区法院因缺乏司法管辖区缺乏司法管辖权,符合特朗普总统的行政命令挑战旨在限制沟通十分法案第230条涉及或通过互联网中介机构传播的第三方内容的责任保护Facebook,Inc。和Twitter,Inc。该法院表示,CDT没有站在挑战行政命令,“迫使CDT(或任何其他私人聚会)迫使义务”,而是...只是指导政府官员采取可能的立法措施。CDT的伤害不具体或迫在眉睫,因此不足以建立第三条现代。即使CDT设法清除了常设障碍,它也面临着纠正性和成熟问题,“法院表示。它还拒绝了CDT可以代表Facebook和Twitter等公司的利益来获得常驻地位的概念。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Telecommunications Reports 》 |2020年第22期| 24-25| 共2页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号