首页> 外文期刊>Telecommunications Policy >Quantum Artificial Intelligence: A 'precautionary' U.S. approach?
【24h】

Quantum Artificial Intelligence: A 'precautionary' U.S. approach?

机译:量子人工智能:'预防'美国方法?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Quantum Computing (QC) and Quantum Artificial Intelligence (QAI) are two powerful new technologies whose potential impacts are just starting to be appreciated. As important as they are likely to be, their implications are still little known. This article's purpose is an attempt to provide a policy space within which to begin fill that void.It presents a non-technical introduction to the concept of quantum mechanics in general, to the unique characteristics of sub-atomic particles, to quantum applications, and to QC and QAI in particular. The development of fully functioning quantum information technologies is in its early stages, but is being pursued aggressively. One of the most salient of these is Quantum Artificial Intelligence (QAI) - a fusion of QC and AI - which some see as potentially threatening. There is little in established telecommunications or information policies to inform our approach to its capabilities.The article notes some of the challenges to development of quantum-based information technologies and considers the scope of global competition to the U.S. in this field, especially from China. It reviews the treatment of "Quantum Information Science" in U.S. policy. It describes the current policy environment and the range of new measures which might be available, if needed, to incorporate QAI into an overall information policy regime.In conclusion the article reviews the debate over adoption of the "precautionary principle" for QAI, an approach to policy when it must deal with weakly understood causes of potentially catastrophic or irreversible events. It sets out the arguments pro and con, and in the absence of an immediate resolution proposes adoption of a policy space in which stakeholders can address their salient concerns, without materially impairing technological progress and commercial viability.
机译:量子计算(QC)和量子人工智能(QAI)是两种强大的新技术,其潜在的影响仍然是开始欣赏。与他们可能的可能一样重要,他们的影响仍然令人着重。本文的目的是尝试提供一个努力,即开始填补空间的策略空间。通常对量子力学概念的非技术性介绍,对亚原子颗粒的独特特征,以及量子应用,以及特别是QC和QAI。完全运行量子信息技术的发展处于早期阶段,但正在积极追求。其中最突出的是量子人工智能(QAI) - QC和AI的融合 - 有些人认为可能威胁。既定的电信或信息政策中几乎没有通知我们的能力。文章指出了一些挑战,以发展量子的信息技术发展,并认为全球竞争的范围在这一领域,特别是来自中国。它审查了美国政策的“量子信息科学”的治疗。它描述了当前的政策环境和如果需要,将QAI合并到整体信息政策制度中可能提供的新措施范围。在结束文章中,审查了通过对QAI的“预防原则”的辩论,一种方法在政策时,它必须处理弱势理解的潜在灾难性或不可逆转的事件的原因。它阐述了论证,并且在没有立即解决方案的情况下,提出采用利益相关者可以解决其突出问题的政策空间,而无需实质上损害技术进步和商业可行性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号