...
首页> 外文期刊>Telecom A.M >CONVERGENCE WON’T CHANGE FCC, FORMER OFFICIALS SAY
【24h】

CONVERGENCE WON’T CHANGE FCC, FORMER OFFICIALS SAY

机译:融合不会改变FCC,前官员说

获取原文

摘要

Convergence is blurring industry distinctions, but don’t expect the FCC’s regulatory approach to change soon, former FCC officials said Thurs. at a Pulver conference. The agency has little choice but to bide its time until Congress provides clear guidance, they said. “I think the FCC will try to keep its fences mended and look to the Hill for true reform” of the regulatory distinctions between common carrier and information services, said attorney David Irwin, a former FCC Common Carrier Bureau staffer. As new technology tests traditional regulation, the FCC will be “very different looking in the next 5-10 years, but I don’t know how,” said Stagg Newman, ex- FCC chief technologist now at McKinsey & Co. “Rethinking [the definition of] `common carrier’ is probably the key issue [since] a lot of fundamentals are being broken,” Newman said. Asked to gauge the changes since he left, Irwin said “the tone is more heated and has gotten nastier.” He said FCC decisions seem “driven more by lobbyists and powerful companies than by legal precedent and statutes.”
机译:美国联邦通信委员会(FCC)前任官员说,融合趋势正在模糊行业差异,但不要指望美国联邦通信委员会(FCC)的监管方式会很快改变。在粉尘会议上。他们说,该机构别无选择,只能争取时间,直到国会提供明确的指导。 FCC前通用电信局工作人员律师David Irwin表示:“我认为FCC将努力修补障碍,并期待Hill对真正的通用电信和信息服务之间的监管区别进行真正的改革。”麦肯锡公司前FCC首席技术专家Stagg Newman说,随着新技术测试传统法规,FCC“在未来5至10年内将大为不同,但我不知道如何。”纽曼说:“由于许多基本原理被打破,'共同承运人'的定义可能是关键问题。”当被问及衡量他离开后的变化时,欧文说:“语气更加激烈,变得更加丑陋。”他说,FCC的决定似乎“更多是由游说者和有实力的公司驱动,而不是法律先例和法规所驱动”。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Telecom A.M 》 |2005年第219期| P.1-1| 共1页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号