...
首页> 外文期刊>Telecom A M >COMCAST LAWYER SAYS FCC COURT LOSS WOULDN 扵rnJUSTIFY BROADBAND RECLASSIFICATION
【24h】

COMCAST LAWYER SAYS FCC COURT LOSS WOULDN 扵rnJUSTIFY BROADBAND RECLASSIFICATION

机译:律师表示FCC法院裁定Would“ rn”裁定宽带重新分类

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The FCC shouldn 抰 rush to reclassify broadband as a Title II service even if the commission loses the Comcast casernin the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit as expected, said Helgi Walker, the attorney who arguedrnthe case for Comcast, speaking at a Federalist Society event. The court 抯 decision probably will be narrow enough notrnto undermine much of the FCC 抯 authority, she said. 揟he most the D.C. Circuit could hold is that the agency erred inrnadopting the Comcast order,?Walker said. 揑t is not accurate to say that all FCC authority over the Internet will berngone. It will mean that particular rules failed to withstand judicial review under the fact-specific ancillary authority test.?
机译:辩护Comcast案的律师Helgi Walker说,即使委员会在美国哥伦比亚特区巡回上诉法院败诉了Comcast案,FCC也不应急于将宽带重新归类为Title II服务。联邦社会事件。她说,法院的决定可能会非常狭窄,不会破坏FCC的大部分权力。沃尔克说:“华盛顿特区巡回法庭最能抓住的是该机构错误地采用了康卡斯特的命令。”不能确切地说,所有FCC在互联网上的授权都将生效。这意味着特定规则在特定于事实的辅助权限测试下无法经受司法审查。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Telecom A M》 |2010年第42期|P.00000001-00000001|共1页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号