首页> 外文期刊>Telecom A.M >Handset Exclusives Criticized as Hurting Cellular Market
【24h】

Handset Exclusives Criticized as Hurting Cellular Market

机译:批评手机市场阻碍手机市场

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Exclusivity agreements can hurt competition by small wireless providers, and because of nthe deals four major wireless carriers don't operate as a "fully competitive marketplace," Seth nBloom, the Senate Antitrust Subcommittee's counsel, said at a Broadband Breakfast nevent. Exclusivity contracts “diminish the spread of broadband in rural areas,” because nsmall carriers like Cellular One that serve rural areas can’t compete with the big providers who noffer the "latest and greatest" devices through the contracts, creating a “vicious circle,” said nJulia Tanner, general counsel of cellular operator MTPCS. Consumers "don't win" under the ncontracts because they may not have access to the phones they want, said Parul Desai, nConsumers Union's communications policy counsel. But Coleman Brazelon, Brattle Group nprincipal, said AT&T's iPhone exclusive produced “far more options” in the handset market, nand if “Apple took a different path today, we’d all have iPhones.”
机译:参议院反托拉斯小组委员会的顾问Seth nBloom在宽带早餐晚会上说,排他性协议可能会损害小型无线提供商的竞争,并且由于nthe交易的缘故,四大无线运营商没有成为“完全竞争的市场”。排他性合同“减少了农村地区宽带的传播”,因为像Cellular One这样为农村地区提供服务的小型运营商无法与通过合同提供“最新,最先进”设备的大型提供商竞争,从而形成了“恶性循环,蜂窝运营商MTPCS的总顾问nJulia Tanner说。 nConsumers Union的通讯政策顾问Parul Desai表示,根据n合同,消费者“不会赢”,因为他们可能无法使用他们想要的电话。但是Brattle Group的总裁科尔曼·布拉泽伦(Coleman Brazelon)表示,AT&T的iPhone独家产品在手机市场上提供了“更多选择”,并且,如果“今天的苹果采取了不同的做法,我们所有人都将拥有iPhone”。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Telecom A.M》 |2011年第32期|p.1|共1页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号