...
【24h】

Wireless

机译:无线

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

CTIA took issue with arguments the Independent Telephone & Telecommunications Alliancenmade last week (http://bit.ly/11UtL9x) that wireless and wireline voice services should be lumped into ansingle interstate telecommunications service provider (ITSP) category for assessing regulatory fees, in anletter to the FCC. “First, it is undisputed that the wireless industry supports a greater portion of the Commission’snbudget than any other industry segment, including wireline carriers,” CTIA said in an ex partenfiling posted by the FCC Tuesday (http://bit.ly/1aqA44J). “Second, ITTA’s reliance on the Commission’sndecision to include interconnected VoIP providers in the ITSP regulatory fee is also misguided and uninformed. Prior to that decision, interconnected VoIP providers were not subject to any regulatory fees —nunlike wireless regulatees who have been paying regulatory fees since their inception. In fact, wirelessnregulatees that provide interconnected VoIP service also separately pay ITSP regulatory fees based uponntheir VoIP end user revenues.”
机译:CTIA上周对独立电话与电信联盟(http://bit.ly/11UtL9x)提出质疑,认为无线和有线语音服务应归入单一州际电信服务提供商(ITSP)类别,以评估监管费用。到FCC。 CTIA在FCC周二发布的一份部分摘要中表示:“首先,无线行业在委员会预算中所占的份额比任何其他行业部门(包括有线运营商)都要大,这是无可争议的。” 1aqA44J)。 “第二,ITTA依赖委员会的决定将互连的VoIP提供商包括在ITSP监管费用中,这也是误导性的,也是毫无根据的。在做出此决定之前,互连的VoIP提供商不需缴纳任何监管费用-与自成立以来就一直在缴纳监管费用的无线监管机构不同。实际上,提供互连VoIP服务的无线监管机构还根据其VoIP最终用户的收入分别支付ITSP监管费用。”

著录项

  • 来源
    《Telecom A.M 》 |2013年第137期| 15-17| 共3页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号