首页> 外文期刊>Technology Review >WHY NOT A 40-MPG SUV
【24h】

WHY NOT A 40-MPG SUV

机译:为什么不是40 MPG SUV

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

To get a sense of the auto industry's progress in fuel efficiency, look no further than the 2002 Chevy Blazer. The model with automatic transmission, six cylinders, and four-wheel drive gets 18 miles per gallon (mpg), two miles less than a comparably equipped Blazer did in 1985. Indeed, in those 17 years the average fuel economy of the entire fleet of U.S. cars and light trucks declined from 26 mpg to 24 mpg梚n part because of the rising proportion of gas-guzzling sport-utility vehicles (SUVs). Yet in March, when auto industry lobbyists claimed that building more fuel-efficient cars would be "too difficult," the U.S. Senate once again killed legislation that would raise the country's Corporate Average Fuel Economy standards. It was a familiar dance; Congress has not raised the standards even once during those same 17 years.
机译:为了了解汽车行业在燃油效率方面的进步,别无选择,只有2002年的Chevy Blazer。具有自动变速箱,六缸和四轮驱动的模型每加仑汽油可行驶18英里(英里),比1985年装备相同的Blazer少2英里。事实上,在这17年中,整个车队的平均燃油经济性美国汽车和轻型卡车从26 mpg下降到24 mpg / n,这是因为耗油量大的运动型多功能车(SUV)的比例增加。然而,在三月份,当汽车行业的游说者声称制造更高燃油效率的汽车“太困难了”时,美国参议院再次取消了提高该国企业平均燃油经济性标准的立法。那是一种熟悉的舞蹈;国会在这17年中甚至没有一次提高标准。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号