首页> 外文期刊>Technology and innovation >'WHY' VS. 'WHAT,' OR 'THE BAD PENNY OPERA': GENDER AND BIAS IN SCIENCE
【24h】

'WHY' VS. 'WHAT,' OR 'THE BAD PENNY OPERA': GENDER AND BIAS IN SCIENCE

机译:“为什么”VS。 “是什么”或“坏小鸡歌剧”:科学中的性别和偏见

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The research of today has been shaped by how young scientists were viewed and received when starting out decades earlier. The author reflects on her personal experiences as a woman pursuing a science career and looks at contemporary contributions to innovation and science by men and women. Although women have been routinely asked "why" they wanted to enter a scientific field while men have been asked "what" field they wanted to enter, the author asserts that an objective look is revealing. An analysis of the data available on the National Academy of Inventors website demonstrates: 1) equal creativity as shown by categories of patents held by both men and women and 2) the effect of the early, and possibly continuing, bias during the careers of women in that men hold more patents than women.
机译:几十年前开始时,年轻科学家的看法和接受方式决定了今天的研究。作者回顾了自己作为一名从事科学事业的女性的个人经历,并探讨了当代男性和女性对创新和科学的贡献。尽管经常向女性询问“为什么”要进入科学领域,而男性一直被询问“要”进入什么领域,但作者断言是客观的。对美国国家发明院网站上可用数据的分析表明:1)男女平等的专利类别显示了同等的创造力; 2)女性职业生涯早期(甚至可能持续)偏见的影响因为男人比女人拥有更多的专利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号