...
首页> 外文期刊>Technology analysis & strategic management >The Governance of Agro- and Pharmaceutical Biotechnology Innovation: Public Policy and Industrial Strategy
【24h】

The Governance of Agro- and Pharmaceutical Biotechnology Innovation: Public Policy and Industrial Strategy

机译:农业和制药生物技术创新的治理:公共政策和产业战略

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Multinational companies in the life science sector are heavily influenced by government policies and regulations and in turn attempt to influence these actors nationally and internationally. This paper focuses on recent and on-going research, principally on the agro-biotechnology and, to a lesser extent, on the pharmaceutical industries, covering the evolution of policy and regulation in Europe, how policies are influenced by stakeholder pressures and how policy in turn influences company strategies for product development. We focus particularly on new 'governance' agendas in Europe and consider the relative impacts of enabling, constraining, discriminating and indiscriminate policies on company strategies as part of our development of an integrated approach to policy and governance. We also consider changes in external operating environments for multinational companies and compare past histories and present pressures on agro-biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies. The paper argues, with evidence, that a more enabling and discriminating policy and regulatory environment can achieve public goals more efficiently and effectively, taking account of impacts on innovation, than more blunt policy instruments. This type of environment takes into account the resources and capabilities available to firms and research laboratories rather than relying on broad brush carrot and stick approaches.
机译:生命科学领域的跨国公司在很大程度上受到政府政策和法规的影响,进而试图在国内和国际上影响这些行为者。本文着重于近期和正在进行的研究,主要是关于农业生物技术的研究,以及在较小程度上,是关于制药工业的研究,涵盖了欧洲政策和法规的演变,利益相关者压力如何影响政策以及如何在利益相关者中施加政策。转向影响公司的产品开发策略。我们特别关注欧洲新的“治理”议程,并考虑制定,限制,歧视和不加区分的政策对公司战略的相对影响,这是我们制定政策与治理综合方法的一部分。我们还考虑了跨国公司外部运营环境的变化,并比较了过去的历史以及当前对农业生物技术和制药公司的压力。该论文有证据表明,考虑到对创新的影响,与更钝的政策工具相比,更有利和更具歧视性的政策和监管环境可以更有效地实现公共目标。这种类型的环境考虑了公司和研究实验室可用的资源和能力,而不是依靠广泛的胡萝卜和棒子方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号