首页> 外文期刊>Technological forecasting and social change >Technology Forgiveness: Why emerging technologies differ in their resilience to institutional instability
【24h】

Technology Forgiveness: Why emerging technologies differ in their resilience to institutional instability

机译:技术宽恕:为什么新兴技术在其恢复能力方面对机构不稳定不同

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Long-term public support may encourage the diffusion of emerging technologies by coordinating the generation of knowledge and providing patient funding, but unexpected policy changes may hinder private investment and even lead to situations of technology lockout. Leveraging archival data; insights from 45 interviews across academia, industry, and government; and 75 hours of participant observations, we develop insights about why institutional instability in Portugal affected the adoption of Polymer Additive Manufacturing (PAM) and Metal Additive Manufacturing (MAM) differently. In both cases, Portugal invested in the technology relatively early. While PAM has been widely adopted, including increasingly in high-tech applications, MAM adoption has been modest despite MAM?s potential to greatly improve the performance and competitiveness of metal molds. From the comparison between PAM and MAM, we generate theory about technological and contextual factors that affect ?technological forgiveness?, defined as the resilience of a new technology?s adoption to institutional instability.
机译:长期公众支持可以通过协调知识和提供患者的资金来鼓励新兴技术的扩散,但意外的政策变化可能会阻碍私人投资,甚至导致技术锁定的情况。利用档案数据;来自学术界,行业和政府的45个访谈的见解;和75小时的参与者观察,我们开发了关于为什么葡萄牙的机构不稳定的洞察力影响了聚合物添加剂制造(PAM)和金属添加剂制造(MAM)的采用。在这两种情况下,葡萄牙相对早期投资了该技术。虽然帕姆已被广泛采用,但包括越来越多的高科技应用,妈妈采用虽然可能会大大提高金属模具的性能和竞争力,但妈妈采用已经适度。从PAM和MAM之间的比较来看,我们生成关于影响的技术和背景因素的理论?技术宽恕的?,定义为新技术的恢复力,以使机构不稳定的采用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号