...
首页> 外文期刊>Technological forecasting and social change >Does energy research funding work? Evidence from the Natural Science Foundation of China using TEI@I method
【24h】

Does energy research funding work? Evidence from the Natural Science Foundation of China using TEI@I method

机译:能源研究经费有效吗?来自中国自然科学基金会的TEI @ I方法的证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Improving energy productivity is a top priority for China, and funding recearch projects may be an effective way to achieve the goal. Therefore, how to evaluate and find ways to enhance the promote effect of energy related research funding on energy productivity is urgent and meaningful. This paper uses the TEI@I method. In the first stage, we construct a total-factor energy productivity index (TEPI) based on the global non-radial directional distance function (GNDDF) and Malmquist index to illustrate the dynamic change of energy productivity growth for China during the period 2006-2015. We find that the TEPI shows a rising trend for most of the study period and is mainly driven by the technological progress. In the second stage, we use the econometric approach. The energy related research funding sponsored by the Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) has exerted remarkable positive effect on raising the TEPI and the technical progress in the process of energy use. We further propose some policy implications to enhance the promote effect of NSFC funding on raising the TEPI.
机译:提高能源生产率是中国的当务之急,对项目进行资助可能是实现该目标的有效途径。因此,如何评估和找到方法来增强与能源有关的研究经费对能源生产率的促进作用是紧迫而有意义的。本文使用TEI @ I方法。在第一阶段,我们基于全球非径向方向距离函数(GNDDF)和Malmquist指数构建全要素能源生产率指数(TEPI),以说明2006-2015年中国能源生产率增长的动态变化。我们发现TEPI在大多数研究期间都呈上升趋势,并且主要是由技术进步驱动的。在第二阶段,我们使用计量经济学方法。中国自然科学基金(NSFC)资助的能源相关研究基金在提高TEPI和能源使用过程中的技术进步方面发挥了显著作用。我们进一步提出一些政策含义,以增强国家自然科学基金资助对提高TEPI的促进作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号