首页> 外文期刊>Technological forecasting and social change >Conditions for politically accelerated transitions: Historical institutionalism, the multi-level perspective, and two historical case studies in transport and agriculture
【24h】

Conditions for politically accelerated transitions: Historical institutionalism, the multi-level perspective, and two historical case studies in transport and agriculture

机译:政治上加速过渡的条件:历史制度主义,多层次视角以及运输和农业领域的两个历史案例研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This article investigates the conditions under which policymakers are likely to decisively accelerate socio-technical transitions. We develop a conceptual framework that combines insights from historical institutionalism and the Multi-Level Perspective to better understand the political dimension in transitions, focusing particularly on the mechanisms of political defection from incumbent regime to niche-innovation. We distinguish two ideal type patterns, one where external (landscape) shocks create a 'critical juncture' and one where gradual feedbacks change the balance of power between niche-innovation and regime. We also identify more proximate conditions such as external pressures on policymakers (from business interests, mass publics, and technologies) and policy internal developments (changes in problem definitions and access to institutional arrangements). We apply this framework to two historical case studies in which UK policymakers deliberately accelerated transitions: the transition from rail to road transport (1920-1970); and the transition from traditional mixed agriculture to specialised wheat agriculture (1920-1970). We analyse the conditions for major policy change in each case and draw more general conclusions. We also discuss implications for contemporary low-carbon transitions, observing that while some favourable conditions are in place, they do not yet meet all the prerequisites for political acceleration.
机译:本文研究了决策者可能果断地加速社会技术转型的条件。我们建立了一个概念框架,将历史制度主义和多层次视角的见解相结合,以更好地理解转型中的政治层面,尤其关注从现任政权到利基创新的政治背叛机制。我们区分了两种理想的类型模式,一种是外部(横向)冲击造成“关键关头”,另一种是逐渐的反馈改变了利基创新与政权之间的力量平衡。我们还确定了更接近的情况,例如对决策者的外部压力(来自商业利益,大众和技术)和政策内部发展(问题定义的变化和机构安排的获得)。我们将此框架应用于两个历史案例研究中,英国决策者在这些案例研究中故意加速了转型:从铁路到公路的过渡(1920-1970年);从传统的混合农业到专业化的小麦农业的转变(1920-1970年)。我们分析了每种情况下重大政策变更的条件,并得出了更笼统的结论。我们还讨论了对当代低碳转型的影响,并指出尽管存在一些有利条件,但这些条件尚未满足政治加速的所有先决条件。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号