...
首页> 外文期刊>Technological forecasting and social change >R&D cluster quality measures and technology maturity
【24h】

R&D cluster quality measures and technology maturity

机译:研发集群质量测度和技术成熟度

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

"Innovation indicators" strive to track the maturation of an emerging technology to help forecast its prospective development. One rich source of information is the changing content of discourse of R&D, as the technology progresses. We analyze the content of research paper abstracts obtained by searching large databases on a given topic. We then map the evolution of that topic's emphasis areas. The present research seeks to validate a process that creates factors (clusters) based on term usage in technical papers. Three composite quality measures―cohesion, entropy, and F measure―are computed. Using these measures, we create standard factor groupings that optimize the composite term sets and facilitate comparisons of the R&D emphasis areas (i.e., clusters) over time. The conceptual foundation for this approach lies in the presumption that domain knowledge expands and becomes more application specific in nature as a technology matures. We hypothesize implications for this knowledge expansion in terms of the three factor measures, then observe these empirically for the case of a particular technology―autonomous navigation. These metrics can provide indicators of technological maturation.
机译:“创新指标”致力于跟踪新兴技术的成熟度,以帮助预测其未来发展。随着技术的进步,丰富的信息来源之一就是R&D讨论内容的变化。我们分析了通过在给定主题上搜索大型数据库而获得的研究论文摘要的内容。然后,我们绘制该主题重点领域的演变图。本研究旨在验证一种基于技术论文中术语使用情况创建因素(集群)的过程。计算了三个综合质量测度:内聚力,熵和F测度。使用这些措施,我们创建标准因子分组,以优化组合术语集,并随时间推移比较R&D重点领域(即集群)。这种方法的概念基础在于以下假设:随着技术的成熟,领域知识在本质上会扩展并变得更加特定于应用程序。我们从三个因素测度中假设了这种知识扩展的含义,然后针对特定技术(自主导航)进行经验观察。这些指标可以提供技术成熟度的指标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号