首页> 外文期刊>Technological forecasting and social change >The dynamics of public opinion on nuclear power. Interpreting an experiment in the Netherlands
【24h】

The dynamics of public opinion on nuclear power. Interpreting an experiment in the Netherlands

机译:公众对核电的看法。解释荷兰的一项实验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

This paper aims at clarifying factors that played a role in the formation of public attitudes towards nuclear power generation in the 1970s and 1980s in the Netherlands. The paper especially focuses on the effects of a government initiated societal discussion on energy policy between 1980 and 1985. It thereby intends to draw lessons from the controversies of the past for discussions that might return as several groups are arguing in favor of a "nuclear renaissance". The concept of 'interpretive package' is used as an intermediate concept to link the controversy on nuclear power to wider societal issues. First, the paper briefly describes the nuclear power controversy in the Netherlands. It then reconstructs public opinion on the nuclear power issue between 1974 and 2006. Finally, it analyzes how the media linked the nuclear power issue to wider issues in society. In its final analyses, the explanation of public opinion formation in terms of interpretive packages is compared to other explanatory models. The paper concludes that there is a strong indication that a main explanation for changes in the 'nuclear public opinion' in Western countries can be found in styles that governments apply in dealing with their citizens. The paper Finally reflects upon possible consequences of these findings for future debates on nuclear power generation.
机译:本文旨在阐明在1970年代和1980年代荷兰公众对核能发电的态度形成中所起的作用。本文尤其关注政府发起的关于能源政策的社会讨论在1980年至1985年之间的影响。因此,本文旨在从过去的争论中吸取经验教训,以供讨论,由于一些团体争辩说赞成“核复兴”,这些讨论可能会重演。 ”。 “解释性一揽子计划”的概念用作将核电争议与更广泛的社会问题联系起来的中间概念。首先,本文简要介绍了荷兰的核电争议。然后,它重建了1974年至2006年之间关于核电问题的公众舆论。最后,它分析了媒体如何将核电问题与社会上的广泛问题联系起来。在其最终分析中,将根据解释性软件包对民意形成的解释与其他解释模型进行了比较。本文的结论是,有很强的迹象表明,可以用政府在与公民打交道时所采用的方式找到对西方国家“核民意”变化的主要解释。最后,论文对这些发现可能对未来有关核能发电的辩论的后果进行了反思。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号