首页> 外文学位 >United States public diplomacy in the new Netherlands, 1945--1958: Policy, ideology, and the instrumentality of American power.
【24h】

United States public diplomacy in the new Netherlands, 1945--1958: Policy, ideology, and the instrumentality of American power.

机译:1945年至1958年在新荷兰的美国公共外交:政策,意识形态和美国权力的手段。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Drawing on archival sources in the U.S. and the Netherlands, this dissertation addresses the question of American power in the Netherlands in the early years of the Cold War. Two important methodological concerns inhere. The first distinguishes between American mass culture, on the one hand, and the intentionality of U.S. state power on the other. The second concern is to trace both the transmission and the reception of U.S. policy. A "public diplomacy" framework is thus established by which the ideological preferences of U.S. policymakers are established and analyzed within the modernizing postwar Dutch political economy. A series of encounters between U.S. policy and discrete aspects of the postwar Netherlands are examined, including the economic doctrines of U.S. policymakers as expressed in the Marshall Plan, the effect of the American diplomatic ideal of the "Free World" on Dutch diplomacy, U.S. military aid, and the mobilization of American information policy within postwar Dutch mass culture. This kaleidoscopic approach avoids the cultural shortcomings of a traditional diplomatic approach while viewing U.S. power in the Netherlands as a discrete and intentional presence.; American historians have largely neglected contemporary Dutch history save for the Dutch role in postwar de-colonization. The analysis finds that the postwar reconstruction of Dutch politics, economy, and culture, which occurred within the context of the concerted projection of post-WWII U.S. power, remained a decidedly Dutch affair. The rebuilding of Dutch society constituted something of a revolution in political and economic thinking compared to prewar Dutch society, and stands in sharp contrast to the general political and cultural retrenchment of American society in those years. American economic, political, and cultural power was essential to Dutch modernization, which proceeded along Dutch lines quite apart from the ideological preferences explicitly conveyed in U.S. public diplomacy. U.S. power, in other words, became an instrument, but not an ideological agent, in postwar Dutch modernization.
机译:本文利用美国和荷兰的档案资料,探讨了冷战初期美国在荷兰的权力问题。这里有两个重要的方法论问题。第一个区分一方面是美国大众文化,另一方面是美国国家政权的有意性。第二个问题是追踪美国政策的发送和接收。这样就建立了一个“公共外交”框架,通过它可以在战后荷兰政治经济现代化的过程中建立和分析美国决策者的意识形态偏好。研究了美国政策与战后荷兰各方面之间的一系列遭遇,包括马歇尔计划中表达的美国决策者的经济学说,“自由世界”的美国外交理想对荷兰外交的影响,美国军事援助以及战后荷兰大众文化中的美国信息政策动员。这种千变万化的方法避免了传统外交方法的文化缺陷,同时将美国在荷兰的权力视为离散和故意存在。除了荷兰人在战后非殖民化中的作用外,美国历史学家在很大程度上忽略了当代荷兰人的历史。分析发现,战后对荷兰政治,经济和文化的重建是在第二次世界大战后美国政权的协调一致的背景下发生的,仍然是荷兰的事务。与战前的荷兰社会相比,荷兰社会的重建构成了政治和经济思想的革命,与当时美国社会的总体政治和文化紧缩形成鲜明对比。美国的经济,政治和文化力量对于荷兰的现代化至关重要。荷兰的现代化沿荷兰的路线进行,与美国公共外交中明确表达的意识形态偏好大相径庭。换句话说,美国力量成为战后荷兰现代化的工具,但不是意识形态的推动者。

著录项

  • 作者

    Snyder, David J.;

  • 作者单位

    Southern Illinois University at Carbondale.;

  • 授予单位 Southern Illinois University at Carbondale.;
  • 学科 History European.; History United States.; Political Science International Law and Relations.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2006
  • 页码 609 p.
  • 总页数 609
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 欧洲史;美洲史;国际法;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号