【24h】

Ditch the Hose

机译:沟管软管

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

There are two reasons I buy tools that require cords or hoses. Sometimes, that's all there is. More often, it's to save money-and that almost always ends up costing me. The inconvenience of running extension cords or dragging out compressors and hoses often overwhelms the satisfaction of saving a few bucks. And if I find myself using the less-expensive tool more than anticipated, I end up buying the cordless version anyway.After going through that dumb routine at least a half-dozen times, I developed a credo I apply to every new tool purchase: Never buy a corded tool when a cordless tool will do.Until recently, I didn't think that really applied to framing nailers. The gas-fired Paslode nailers that have been around seemingly forever are fine for small jobs, but nobody considers them a replacement for pneumatics. But gas-fired framers aren't the only cordless option these days. There are now a handful of battery-operated framers that, depending on the kind of work you do, could conceivably replace pneumatics entirely without any loss of productivity. For those not already invested in compressors and hoses or those just starting out, these tools could even save you money.
机译:我购买需要电线或软管的工具有两个原因。有时,这就是所有人。更常见的是,它可以省钱 - 几乎总是最终会让我成本核。运行延长线或拖出压缩机和软管的不便通常压倒储蓄少量雄鹿的满足感。如果我发现自己使用较便宜的工具超过预期,那么我最终会购买无绳的版本。通过该愚蠢的例程,至少逐半时次,我开发了一个电信,我申请了每个新工具购买:当一个无绳的工具将在最近,我没有购买一个有线电器工具。我不认为真的适用于框架钉子。燃气的帕斯莱德钉在似乎永远是小的工作,但没有人认为他们对气动学的替代品。但是这些天的燃气破碎者不是唯一的无绳选择。现在有一些电池供电的帧,取决于您所做的工作类型,可以在没有任何生产率的情况下完全替代气动学。对于那些尚未投资的压缩机和软管或刚刚开始的人,这些工具甚至可以节省您的资金。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号