...
首页> 外文期刊>Sustainability science >From complex systems analysis to transformational change:a comparative appraisal of sustainability science projects
【24h】

From complex systems analysis to transformational change:a comparative appraisal of sustainability science projects

机译:从复杂的系统分析到变革的变革:可持续性科学项目的比较评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Sustainability science is being developed in constructive tension between a descriptive-analytical and a transformational mode. The first is concerned with analyzing problems in coupled human-environment systems, whereas the second conducts research on practical solutions to those problems. Transformational sustainability research is confronted with the challenges of generating actionable knowledge, incorporating knowledge from outside acade-mia, and dealing with different values and political interests. This study approaches the theory and promise of sustainability science through a comparative appraisal of five empirical sustainability science projects. We exempl-arily appraise in how far sustainability science succeeds and fails in yielding solution options for sustainability problems based on an evaluative framework (that accounts for the particularities of sustainability science). The selected sustainability projects cover a range of topics (water, bioen-ergy, land use, solar energy, urban development), regions (from coastal to mountainous, from rural to urban areas, in several countries in Africa, Europe, and South and North America), spatial levels (from village to country levels), and research approaches. The comparative results indicate accomplishments regarding problem focus and basic transformational research methodology, but also highlight deficits regarding stakeholder participation, actionable results, and larger impacts. We conclude with suggestions on how to fully realize the potential of sustainability science as a solution-oriented endeavor, including advanced collaborative research settings, advances in transformational research methodologies, cross-case generalization, as well as reducing institutional barriers.
机译:在描述性分析模式与转换模式之间的建设性张力中,正在发展可持续性科学。第一个与分析人类环境耦合系统中的问题有关,而第二个与对这些问题的实际解决方案进行研究。转型的可持续性研究面临着以下挑战:生成可行的知识,吸收来自外部学术界的知识以及处理不同的价值观和政治利益。本研究通过对五个经验性可持续性科学项目的比较评估,探讨了可持续性科学的理论和前景。我们示例性地评估了可持续科学在基于评估框架(考虑了可持续科学的特殊性)得出的可持续性问题的解决方案中,成功与否的程度。选定的可持续性项目涵盖一系列主题(水,生物能源,土地利用,太阳能,城市发展),区域(从沿海到山区,从农村到城市地区),在非洲,欧洲和南部多个国家和地区。北美),空间级别(从村庄到国家/地区)以及研究方法。比较结果表明了在解决问题重点和基本转型研究方法方面的成就,但同时也突出了利益相关者参与,可采取行动的结果和更大影响方面的缺陷。最后,我们就如何充分发挥可持续性科学作为解决方案导向的潜力提出了一些建议,包括先进的协作研究环境,变革性研究方法的进步,跨案例概括以及减少机构壁垒。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号