首页> 外文期刊>Sustainability science >Affective sustainable landscapes and care ecologies: getting a real feel for alternative food communities
【24h】

Affective sustainable landscapes and care ecologies: getting a real feel for alternative food communities

机译:情感可持续景观和关怀生态:对替代食品社区的真实感受

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper examines some of the more-than-representational knowledge that underpins food systems. As argued, it is not enough to know what sustainability is. We have to, literally, be able to feel (care for, taste, practiceaEuro broken vertical bar) it. The author begins by drawing upon interviews with food scientists, food advertisers and marketers, and executives from the food industry. Interviews with individuals from the food manufacturing industry reveal numerous tensions routinely grappled with by those actors as they attempted to make the industrial food system appear unproblematic and its wares desirable. The value of these data becomes particularly clear when triangulated with those presented in the paper's second half, where the author discusses some of the findings of research projects still underway-case studies of food-based community activism in Chicago and Denver (USA). The data collectively suggest the existence of a class of "barriers" that the literature-and many activists and practitioners-miss but which must be overcome if we hope to see a diversification of foodscapes. These constraints speak specifically to more-than-representational visceralities that buttress industrial food and the system from whence they come-what the author calls "affective barriers". The paper argues (social) bodies need to be "retuned" to the tastes, cares, textures, and practices associated with alternatives to the (food) status quo and offers examples of how this is already being done.
机译:本文研究了构成食品系统基础的一些超越代表性的知识。如所争论的,仅仅知道可持续性是不够的。从字面上看,我们必须能够感觉到它(照看,品尝,练习一条垂直的欧洲竖条)。作者从对食品科学家,食品广告商和市场商人以及食品行业高管的访谈开始。对食品制造行业人士的采访显示,这些参与者在试图使工业食品系统看起来没有问题且其产品令人满意时,通常会应对许多紧张局势。将这些数据与本文的下半部分进行三角剖分时,这些数据的价值变得尤为明显。在本文的后半部分,作者讨论了仍在进行中的研究项目的某些结果,这些研究仍以美国芝加哥和丹佛的基于食物的社区行动主义为例。这些数据共同表明存在一类“障碍”,文献(以及许多激进主义者和实践者)都没有,但是如果我们希望看到多样化的食物景观,必须克服这些障碍。这些限制特别说明了代表性的脏污,它们支撑了工业食品和它们从何而来的体系-作者称之为“情感障碍”。该论文认为,(社会)身体需要与(食物)现状的替代品相关的口味,护理,质地和做法“重新调整”,并提供如何做到这一点的例子。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号