首页> 外文期刊>Survival >New Directions for Transatlantic Security Cooperation
【24h】

New Directions for Transatlantic Security Cooperation

机译:跨大西洋安全合作的新方向

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Western armies are masters of the conventional battlefield, but continue to have difficulty prevailing in unconventional conflict. Yet unconventional missions, including peacekeeping, counterinsurgency, counter-narcotics and counter-terrorism, are the only kind that NATO or EU forces are likely to be collectively assigned for the foreseeable future. These, then, should be the focus for NATO and EU planning, training and equipping. While the UN is the cheapest, most generally acceptable and often most effective instrument for managing international military interventions, there is an effective ceiling beyond which the UN will not suffice. The UN does not do forced entries, and has never fielded more than about 20,000 troops in any single operation. Where these thresholds must be surpassed, NATO, the EU or an ad hoc coalition will be needed. Afghanistan is the next test for Western collective defence efforts. Success there will require greater EU as well as NATO engagement.
机译:西方军队是常规战场的主人,但在非常规冲突中仍然难以克服。然而,在可预见的将来,包括维和,平叛,反毒品和反恐在内的非常规任务是北约或欧盟部队唯一可能被集体派遣的任务。因此,这些应该成为北约和欧盟计划,培训和装备的重点。尽管联合国是管理国际军事干预的最便宜,最普遍接受且通常是最有效的工具,但联合国仍存在一个有效上限,超过该上限便无法满足要求。联合国不会强迫进入,并且从未在任何一次行动中派出超过2万名士兵。在必须超过这些阈值的地方,将需要北约,欧盟或一个特设联盟。阿富汗是西方集体防御努力的下一个考验。那里的成功将需要更多的欧盟以及北约的参与。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Survival》 |2006年第4期|p.39-53|共15页
  • 作者

    James Dobbins;

  • 作者单位

    International Security and Defense Policy Center at the RAND Corporation;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 军事;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号