首页> 外文期刊>Survey Review >Comparing GPS positioning errors derived from GAMIT/GLOBK and Bernese GNSS software packages: A case study in CORS-TR in Turkey
【24h】

Comparing GPS positioning errors derived from GAMIT/GLOBK and Bernese GNSS software packages: A case study in CORS-TR in Turkey

机译:比较来自GAMIT / GLOBK和Bernese GNSS软件包的GPS定位误差:土耳其CORS-TR的案例研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) processing software packages such as GAMIT/GLOBK, Bernese, GIPSY/OASIS etc., have an important role in high-precision GNSS studies. For a single GNSS session, they result in Formal Error (FE) rather than positioning accuracy because it may not be possible to incorporate the correlations in the GNSS data properly into the stochastic model of the estimation procedure. Therefore, a GNSS network used for high-precision studies should be measured repeatedly in different sequential days to have repeatabilities of positions to be used for representing the RMS errors of positioning. This contribution investigates the relationship between the FE and RMS error of Global Positioning System (GPS) positioning for GAMIT/GLOBK (V10.6) and Bernese (V5.2) software packages. For this purpose, seven days of GPS observations in six different sub-networks consisting of totally 36 Continuously Operating Reference Station (CORS) network stations in Turkey are used. The sub-networks were selected such that they were distributed homogenously throughout Turkey. The GPS observations were processed in the ITRF2008 reference frame using both GAMIT/GLOBK and Bernese software packages. Daily repeatabilities of North, East and Up coordinates of each station obtained from two software packages are nearly the same. However, their FEs are very different. GAMIT/GLOBK gives bigger FEs while Bernese results in too smaller FEs compared to their RMS errors of positioning. A linear relationship exists between the average of seven days FEs and the RMS errors for both software packages. This relationship is defined as the 'Scale Factor (SF) = RMS/FE'. It is shown that a unique SF for the corresponding software package can be given as the mean value of the SFs associated with all points used in the study. According to our analysis, the mean SF in the region is 0.38 and 3.82 for GAMIT/GLOBK and Bernese, respectively.
机译:GAMIT / GLOBK,Bernese,GIPSY / OASIS等全球导航卫星系统(GNSS)处理软件包在高精度GNSS研究中具有重要作用。对于单个GNSS会话,它们会导致形式误差(FE)而不是定位精度,因为可能无法将GNSS数据中的相关性正确地合并到估计过程的随机模型中。因此,用于高精度研究的GNSS网络应在不同的连续天重复测量,以使位置的可重复性用于表示定位的RMS误差。此文稿调查了GAMIT / GLOBK(V10.6)和Bernese(V5.2)软件包的全球定位系统(GPS)定位的FE和RMS误差之间的关系。为此,在土耳其由六个36个连续运行的参考站(CORS)网络站点组成的六个不同子网中进行了7天的GPS观测。选择子网以使它们在整个土耳其均匀分布。使用GAMIT / GLOBK和Bernese软件包在ITRF2008参考框架中处理了GPS观测值。从两个软件包获得的每个站点的北,东和上坐标的每日重复性几乎相同。但是,它们的FE截然不同。与定位的RMS误差相比,GAMIT / GLOBK的FE更大,而Bernese的FE太小。两个软件包的平均7天FE和RMS误差之间存在线性关系。此关系定义为“比例因子(SF)= RMS / FE”。结果表明,对应软件包的唯一SF可以作为与研究中使用的所有点相关的SF的平均值给出。根据我们的分析,GAMIT / GLOBK和Bernese在该区域的平均SF分别为0.38和3.82。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号