首页> 外文期刊>Survey methodology >Are probability surveys bound to disappear for the production of official statistics?
【24h】

Are probability surveys bound to disappear for the production of official statistics?

机译:概率调查一定会因生产官方统计数据而消失吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

For several decades, national statistical agencies around the world have been using probability surveys as their preferred tool to meet information needs about a population of interest. In the last few years, there has been a wind of change and other data sources are being increasingly explored. Five key factors are behind this trend: the decline in response rates in probability surveys, the high cost of data collection, the increased burden on respondents, the desire for access to "real-time" statistics, and the proliferation of non-probability data sources. Some people have even come to believe that probability surveys could gradually disappear. In this article, we review some approaches that can reduce, or even eliminate, the use of probability surveys, all the while preserving a valid statistical inference framework. All the approaches we consider use data from a non-probability source; data from a probability survey are also used in most cases. Some of these approaches rely on the validity of model assumptions, which contrasts with approaches based on the probability sampling design. These design-based approaches are generally not as efficient; yet, they are not subject to the risk of bias due to model misspecification.
机译:几十年来,世界各地的国家统计机构一直在利用概率调查作为他们的首选工具,以满足有关兴趣人群的信息需求。在过去的几年里,有一个变化的风,其他数据来源正在越来越探讨。五个关键因素落后于此趋势:概率调查的响应率下降,数据收集的高成本,受访者的负担增加,获取“实时”统计的愿望,以及非概率数据的扩散来源。有些人甚至甚至相信概率调查可能逐渐消失。在本文中,我们审查了一些可以减少或甚至消除使用概率调查的方法,所有的概要调查,都在保留有效的统计推理框架。我们考虑使用来自非概率源的数据的所有方法;在大多数情况下也使用来自概率调查的数据。其中一些方法依赖于模型假设的有效性,这与基于概率采样设计的方法形成鲜明对比。这些基于设计的方法通常不高效;然而,由于模型误操作,它们不会受到偏见的风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号