...
首页> 外文期刊>Surgical Infections >Pharmacoeconomics of Ciprofloxacin plus Metronidazole vs. Piperacillin-Tazobactam for Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infections
【24h】

Pharmacoeconomics of Ciprofloxacin plus Metronidazole vs. Piperacillin-Tazobactam for Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infections

机译:环丙沙星加甲硝唑与哌拉西林-他唑巴坦治疗复杂的腹腔内感染的药物经济学

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: A series of 459 hospitalized adults with complicated intra-abdominal infections participated in a randomized, double-blind, multicenter clinical trial. The present study was conducted to add a pharmacoeconomic analysis to the results.nnMethods: A cost-effectiveness analysis from the perspective of the hospital provider was carried out. Decision analysis was used to illustrate outcomes and to provide a basis on which to conduct a sensitivity analysis. Cost-effectiveness ratios, representing the cost per expected successfully treated patient, were calculated to determine the most cost-effective alternative.nnResults: Among 244 economically evaluable patients, enrolled from 34 centers in the U.S. and Canada, 131 patients received ciprofloxacin-metronidazole (75% clinical success rate), and 113 received piperacillin-tazobactam (65% clinical success rate; p = 0.06). Switch to oral antibiotics was possible for 81 patients who received ciprofloxacin-metronidazole (85% clinical success rate) and 67 piperacillin-tazobactam patients (70% clinical success rate; p = 0.027). The mean hospital cost was US$10,662 ± 7,793 for patients in the ciprofloxacin-metronidazole group and $10,009 ± 7,023 for patients in the piperacillin-tazobactam group (p = 0.492). Significantly lower costs were documented for patients who could be switched to oral antibiotics than for those continued on intravenous antibiotic orders ($8,684 ± 4,120 vs. $12,945 ± 10,204, respectively; p < 0.001). Patients with appendicitis had lower mean hospital costs than those with other infections ($7,169 ± 3,705 vs. $12,097 ± 8,342, respectively; p < 0.001). The cost-effectiveness ratios were $14,216:1 for patients in the ciprofloxacin-metronidazole group and $15,398:1 for patients in the piperacillin-tazobactam group.nnConclusions: The mean hospital costs associated with ciprofloxacin-metronidazole were similar to those of piperacillin-tazobactam for the treatment of adults with complicated intra-abdominal infections. Lower costs were documented for patients able to be switched to oral antibiotics and for patients with appendicitis.
机译:背景:459名住院的并发腹腔内感染的成年人参加了一项随机,双盲,多中心临床试验。进行本研究以在结果中添加药物经济学分析。nn方法:从医院提供者的角度进行了成本效益分析。决策分析用于说明结果并提供进行敏感性分析的基础。计算成本效益比(代表每个预期成功治疗的患者的成本),以确定最具有成本效益的替代方案。nn结果:从美国和加拿大的34个中心招募的244位具有经济价值的患者中,有131例患者接受环丙沙星-甲硝唑(临床成功率达75%),接受哌拉西林-他唑巴坦113例(临床成功率达65%; p = 0.06)。 81例接受环丙沙星-甲硝唑的患者(临床成功率为85%)和67哌拉西林-他唑巴坦的患者(临床成功率为70%; p = 0.027)有可能改用口服抗生素。环丙沙星-甲硝唑组患者的平均住院费用为10,662±7,793美元,哌拉西林-他唑巴坦组的患者的平均住院费用为10,009±7,023美元(p = 0.492)。与继续静脉使用抗生素的患者相比,可以改用口服抗生素的患者的费用明显降低(分别为$ 8,684±4,120和$ 12,945±10,204; p <0.001)。阑尾炎患者的平均住院费用低于其他感染患者(分别为$ 7,169±3,705和$ 12,097±8,342; p <0.001)。环丙沙星-甲硝唑组患者的成本-效果比为$ 14,216:1,哌拉西林-他唑巴坦组患者的成本-效益比为$ 15,398:1。成人并发腹腔内感染的治疗。对于可以改用口服抗生素的患者和阑尾炎患者,费用较低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号