...
首页> 外文期刊>Surgical infections >Costs and Complications Associated with Infected Mesh for Ventral Hernia Repair
【24h】

Costs and Complications Associated with Infected Mesh for Ventral Hernia Repair

机译:与腹侧疝修补的感染网眼相关的成本和并发症

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Background: Mesh hernia repair is widely accepted because of the associated reduction in hernia recurrence compared with suture-based repair. Despite initiatives to reduce risk, mesh infection and mesh removal are a significant challenge. In an era of healthcare value, it is essential to understand the global cost of care, including the incidence and cost of complications. The purpose of this study was to identify the outcomes and costs of care of patients who required the removal of infected hernia mesh.Methods: A review of databases from 2006 through June 2018 identified patients who underwent both ventral hernia repair (VHR) and re-operation for infected mesh removal. Patient demographic and operative details for both procedures, including age, Body Mass Index, mesh type, amount of time between procedures, and information regarding interval procedures were obtained. Clinical outcome measures were the length of the hospital stay, hospital re-admission, incisionon-incision complications, and re-operation. Hospital cost data were obtained from the cost accounting system and were combined with the clinical data for a cost and clinical representation of the cases.Results: Thirty-four patients underwent both VHR and removal of infected mesh material over the 12-year time frame and were included in the analyses; the average age at VHR was 48 years, and 16 patients (47%) were female. Following VHR, 21 patients (62%) experienced incision complications within 90 days post-operatively, the complications ranging from superficial surgical site infection (SSI) to evisceration. A mean of 22.65 months passed between procedures. After mesh removal, 16 patients (47%) experienced further incisional complications; and 22 (65%) patients had at least one re-admission. Eighteen patients (53%) required a minimum of one additional related operative procedure after mesh removal. Median hospital costs nearly doubled (p 0.001) for the mesh removal ($23,841 [interquartile range {IQR} $13,596-$42,148]) compared with the VHR admission ($13,394 [IQR $8,424-$22,161]) not accounting for re-admission costs. A majority experienced hernia recurrence subsequent to mesh removal.Conclusions: Mesh infection after hernia repair is associated with significant morbidity and costs. Hospital re-admission, re-operations, and recurrences are common among these patients, resulting in greater healthcare resource utilization. Development of strategies to prevent mesh infection, identify patients most likely to experience infectious complications, and define best practices for the care of patients with mesh infection are needed.
机译:背景:与基于缝线的修复相比,网眼疝修复被广泛接受,因为疝气复发相关。尽管措施降低了风险,但网眼感染和网眼拆除是一项重大挑战。在医疗保健价值的时代,必须了解全球护理成本,包括并发症的发病率和成本。本研究的目的是确定所需患者的患者的结果和费用,以便删除感染的疝气筛网。方法:从2006年6月到2018年6月的数据库审查鉴定了腹部疝修复(VHR)和重新进行的患者用于感染的网格拆卸的操作。获得了两种程序的患者人口统计和手术细节,包括年龄,体重指数,网格类型,程序之间的时间量以及关于间隔程序的信息。临床结果措施是住院住院的长度,医院重新入场,切口/非切口并发症和重新运行。从成本核算系统获得医院成本数据,并与临床数据相结合,以获得案件的成本和临床代表性。结果:34名患者在12年的时间范围内接受VHR并去除受感染的网格材料,被包括在分析中; VHR的平均年龄为48岁,16名患者(47%)是女性。在术后VHR,21例患者(62%)经过术后90天内经历了切口并发症,并发症从浅表外科遗址感染(SSI)到剥夺。在程序之间通过了22.65个月的平均值。在滤网去除后,16名患者(47%)经历了进一步的切口并发症; 22(65%)患者至少有一次重新入场。在啮合后,18名患者(53%)需要至少一种额外的相关操作程序。与VHR入场($ 13,394 [IQR $ 8,424- $ 22,161])相比,中位医院成本几乎翻了一番(P <0.001)(23,841美元({IQR} 13,596- $ 42,148)),而不是核算重新入场费的费用。大多数人经历过疝气复发,随后在捕获中。结论:疝气修复后的网眼感染与显着的发病率和成本相关。在这些患者中,医院重新入场,重新运营和复发常见,导致更大的医疗资源利用。策略的发展,以防止网眼感染,鉴定最有可能经历传染性并发​​症的患者,并确定需要最佳实践对患有网眼感染的患者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号