Piperacillin/Tazobactam versus Tobramycin-Based Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Type III Open Fractures

摘要

Background: Type III open fractures are associated with an infection rate as high as 50%. The optimal antibiotic for open fracture prophylaxis remains unclear, and the literature comparing the safety and efficacy of different antibiotic regimens is limited. The aim of this study was to compare the composite adverse events (AEs) in patients before and after a change in prophylactic antibiotic management for these injuries from a tobramycin- to a piperacillin/tazobactam-based regimen.Methods: This was a retrospective single-center cohort study of patients with Type III open fractures admitted from January 2010 to December 2016. Patients were included if they received either tobramycin plus cefazolin or clindamycin or piperacillin/tazobactam for fracture prophylaxis. The primary outcome was the rate of composite AEs, which included nephrotoxicity, surgical site infection (SSI), and hospital re-admission with surgical intervention. Secondary outcomes included the rate of SSI within 30 and 60 days after injury. Data were analyzed using the Student t-, Mann-Whitney U, and Fisher exact tests.Results: Eighty-five patients were included. There were 29 events in the tobramycin group compared with three in the piperacillin/tazobactam group. At 30 days, SSI had occurred in 17 patients (27.5%) in the tobramycin group and 1 patient (4.3%) in the piperacillin/tazobactam group (p = 0.033). At 60 days, SSI had occurred in three additional patients in the tobramycin group (p = 0.009).Conclusion: There was no difference in the composite AEs in the piperacillin/tazobactam compared with the tobramycin group. However, SSI within 30 and 60 days was significantly more common with tobramycin.