首页> 外文期刊>Surgical infections >Empiric, Broad-Spectrum Antibiotic Therapy with an Aggressive De-Escalation Strategy Does Not Induce Gram-Negative Pathogen Resistance in Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia
【24h】

Empiric, Broad-Spectrum Antibiotic Therapy with an Aggressive De-Escalation Strategy Does Not Induce Gram-Negative Pathogen Resistance in Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia

机译:具有积极的降级策略的经验性,广谱抗生素治疗不会导致呼吸机相关性肺炎的革兰氏阴性病原菌耐药性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Early, empiric, broad-spectrum antibiotics followed by de-escalation to pathogen-specific therapy is the standard of care for ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). In our surgical intensive care unit (SICU), imipenem-cilastatin (I-C) in combination with tobramycin (TOB) or levofloxacin (LEV) has been used until quantitative bronchoalveolar lavage results are finalized, at which time de-escalation occurs to pathogen-specific agents. With this practice, however, alterations in antimicrobial resistance remain a concern. Our hypothesis was that this strict regimen does not alter antimicrobial susceptibility of common gram-negative VAP pathogens in our SICU.rnMethods: After Institutional Review Board approval, a retrospective review of SICU-specific antibiograms was performed for the sensitivities of common gram-negative VAP pathogens. Time periods were defined as early (January-June 2005) and late (July-December 2006). Chart review of empiric and de-escalation antibiotic usage was obtained. Data were collated, and statistical significance was assessed with the chi-square test using the online Simple Interactive Statistical Analysis tool.rnResults: Imipenem-cilastatin was used 198 times for empiric VAP coverage (811 patient-days), whereas TOB and LEV were given a total of 149 (564 patient-days) and 61 (320 patient-days) times, respectively. Collectively, the susceptibility of gram-negative organisms to I-C did not change (early 91.4%; late 97%; p = 0.33). Individually, non-significant trends to greater sensitivity to I-C were noted for both Pseudomonas aeruginosa (early 85.7%; late 90.9%; p = 0.73) and Acinetobacter baumannii (early 80%; late 100%; p = 0.13). Further, both TOB (early 77.1%; late 70.0%; p = 0.49) and LEV (early 74.3%; late 70.0%; p = 0.67) were found to maintain their susceptibility profiles. The frequency of resistant gram-positive VAPs was unchanged during the study period. Our de-escalation compliance (by 96 h) was 78% for I-C, 77.2% for TOB, and 59% for LEV. When infections requiring I-C were removed from the analysis, de-escalation compliance was improved to 92%.rnConclusions: In our SICU, early, empiric broad-spectrum VAP therapy followed by de-escalation to pathogen-specific agents did not alter antimicrobial resistance and is a valid practice. Further, our compliance with de-escalation practices was higher than published rates.
机译:背景:早期的经验性广谱抗生素,然后降级为病原体特异性治疗是呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)的治疗标准。在我们的外科重症监护病房(SICU)中,亚胺培南-西司他丁(IC)与妥布霉素(TOB)或左氧氟沙星(LEV)结合使用,直到最终定量支气管肺泡灌洗结果得以最终确定,然后降级病原体特异性代理商。然而,通过这种实践,抗微生物剂耐药性的改变仍然是一个问题。我们的假设是,这种严格的治疗方案不会改变我们的SICU中常见的革兰氏阴性VAP病原体的抗菌药敏感性。方法:经过机构审查委员会的批准,对SICU特定的抗菌素谱图进行了回顾性审查,以了解常见的革兰氏阴性VAP的敏感性病原体。时间段定义为早期(2005年1月至6月)和晚期(2006年7月至12月)。获得经验和降级抗生素使用情况的图表审查。结果:整理了数据,并使用在线简单交互式统计分析工具通过卡方检验评估了统计显着性。rn结果:亚胺培南-西司他丁被198次用于经验性VAP覆盖(811患者日),而TOB和LEV被给予总共分别为149次(564个患者日)和61次(320个患者日)。总体而言,革兰氏阴性生物对I-C的敏感性没有变化(早期为91.4%;晚期为97%; p = 0.33)。单独地,铜绿假单胞菌(早期为85.7%;晚期为90.9%; p = 0.73)和鲍曼不动杆菌(早期为80%;晚期为100%; p = 0.13)均注意到对I-C敏感性提高的非显着趋势。此外,发现TOB(早期77.1%;晚期70.0%; p = 0.49)和LEV(早期74.3%;晚期70.0%; p = 0.67)都保持了敏感性。在研究期间,耐药革兰氏阳性VAP的频率没有变化。 I-C的降级依从性(到96小时)为78%,TOB为77.2%,LEV为59%。当从分析中去除需要IC的感染后,降级顺应性提高到92%。rn结论:在我们的SICU中,早期经验性广谱VAP治疗随后降级为病原体特异性药物并没有改变抗菌素耐药性和是有效的做法。此外,我们对降级做法的遵守程度高于已公布的比率。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Surgical infections》 |2010年第5期|p.427-432|共6页
  • 作者单位

    Division of Burns, Trauma Surgery, and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery Maricopa Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona;

    rnDivision of Burns, Trauma Surgery, and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery Maricopa Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona;

    rnDivision of Burns, Trauma Surgery, and Surgical Critical Care Department of Surgery Maricopa Medical Center 2601 East Roosevelt Phoenix, AZ 85008;

    rnDivision of Burns, Trauma Surgery, and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery Maricopa Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona;

    rnDivision of Burns, Trauma Surgery, and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery Maricopa Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona;

    rnDivision of Burns, Trauma Surgery, and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery Maricopa Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona;

    rnDivision of Burns, Trauma Surgery, and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery Maricopa Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona;

    rnDepartment of Pharmacy, Maricopa Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona;

    rnDepartment of Research, Maricopa Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona;

  • 收录信息 美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号