首页> 外文期刊>Studies in economics and finance >Sovereign credit ratings, relative risk ratings and private capital flows: evidence from emerging and frontier markets
【24h】

Sovereign credit ratings, relative risk ratings and private capital flows: evidence from emerging and frontier markets

机译:主权信用评级,相对风险评级和私人资本流动:来自新兴和边境市场的证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose - Relative risk ratings measure the degree by which a country's sovereign rating is better or worse than other countries (Basu et at, 2013). However, the literature on the impacts of sovereign ratings on capital flows has not covered the role of relative risk ratings. This paper aims to examine the effect of relative risk ratings on private capital flows to emerging and frontier market economies is filled. In the analysis, the effect of relative risk ratings to that of absolute sovereign ratings in influencing private capital flows are compared. Design/methodology/approach - This paper examines the influence of sovereign credit ratings and relative risk ratings on private capital flows to 26 emerging and frontier market economies using quarterly data for a 20-year period between 1998 and 2017. A dynamic panel regression model is used to estimate the relationship between ratings and capital flows after controlling for other factors that can influence capital flows such as growth and interest rate differentials and global risk conditions.Findings - The analysis finds that while absolute sovereign credit ratings were an important determinant of net capital inflows prior to the global financial crisis in 2008, the influence of relative risk ratings increased in the post-crisis period. The post-crisis effect of relative ratings appears to be driven mostly by portfolio flows. The main results are robust to an alternate measure of capital flows (gross capital flows instead of net capital flows), to the use of fixed gross domestic product weights in calculating relative risk ratings and to the potential endogeneity of absolute and relative ratings.Originality/value - This study advances the literature on being the first attempt to understand the impact of relative risk ratings on capital flows and also comparing the impact of absolute sovereign ratings and relative risk ratings on capital flows in the pre- and post-global financial crisis periods. The findings imply that emerging and frontier markets need to pay greater attention to their relative economic performance and not just their sovereign ratings.
机译:目的 - 相对风险评级衡量国家主权评级更好或比其他国家更差的程度(2013年Basu等)。但是,关于主权评级对资本流动影响的文献尚未涵盖相对风险评级的作用。本文旨在审查对新兴私人资本流动的相对风险评级对新兴的影响,并填补了前沿市场经济。在分析中,比较了相对风险评级对影响私资流量的绝对主权评级的影响。设计/方法/方法 - 本文研究了主权信用评级和相对风险评级对私人资本流动的影响,在1998年至2017年期间的20年期间使用季度数据进行了季度数据。动态面板回归模型是用于估计在控制可能影响资本流量的其他因素之后估算评级和资本流动之间的关系,这些因素可以影响增长和利率差异和全球风险条件。挑战 - 分析发现,虽然绝对主权信用评级是净资本的重要决定因素在2008年全球金融危机之前流入,危机后时期相对风险评级的影响力增加。相对评级的危机后效果主要由投资组合流动驱动。主要结果是对备用资本流量(总资本流量而非净资本流量)的备忘,以利用固定的国内产品重量计算相对风险评级以及绝对和相对评级的潜在内限。价值 - 本研究进展了文献,即第一次了解相对风险评级对资本流动的影响以及比较绝对主权评级和相对风险评级在全球后和后期的金融危机期间的资本流动的影响。结果暗示,新兴和前沿市场需要更多地关注他们的相对经济表现,而不仅仅是他们的主权评级。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号