首页> 外文期刊>Studies in East European Thought >Nietzsche, postmodernism and the phenomenon of Arvydas Šliogeris in contemporary Lithuanian philosophy
【24h】

Nietzsche, postmodernism and the phenomenon of Arvydas Šliogeris in contemporary Lithuanian philosophy

机译:尼采,后现代主义和当代立陶宛哲学中的阿维达斯·斯里格里吉斯现象

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This article is based on the presupposition that postmodern philosophy has been largely influenced by Nietzsche’s writings. The author raises the question of how Nietzsche and postmodern philosophy are interpreted in the contemporary philosophical discourse in Lithuania. The conclusion drawn is that many philosophy critics in Lithuania are interested in Nietzsche’s philosophy (Mickevičius, Sodeika, Šerpytytė, Sverdiolas, Baranova) and in the problems of postmodern philosophy (Keršytė, Rubavičius, Žukauskaitė, Šerpytytė, Sverdiolas, Baranova, Norkus). The article also raises a second crucial question: beyond the critics, are there any truly authentic postmodern thinkers in Lithuania? This article’s main hypotheses is that Arvydas Šliogeris’ philosophy is the best and perhaps the only example of original Lithuanian postmodern thought; it is based on, and interconnected with, the deeply inherited roots of existential thought in Lithuanian philosophical culture. The arguments for these hypotheses are as follows: first, Šliogeris is the first philosopher in Lithuania who has tried to reason in an interdisciplinary manner, e.g. trying to overcome the modernistic distinction between philosophy and the arts (especially literature, poetry, and the visual arts); secondly, Šliogeris’s philosophizing is indispensable to his writings—his texts are examples of an experience of writing as thinking and thinking as writing; thirdly, following Deleuze’s presupposition that the philosopher is a creator, one can see this creative aspect in Šliogeris’s approach. His texts show how it is possible to synthesize insights from philosophy and poetry.
机译:本文基于这样的假设,即后现代哲学在很大程度上受到尼采著作的影响。作者提出了一个问题,即在立陶宛的当代哲学话语中如何解释尼采和后现代哲学。得出的结论是,立陶宛的许多哲学评论家都对尼采的哲学(米克耶维奇,索迪卡,塞尔皮蒂特,斯维尔迪洛亚,巴拉诺瓦)以及后现代哲学的问题感兴趣(凯尔瑟蒂,鲁比维奇斯,Žukauskaitė,塞尔皮蒂斯,诺维拉,巴拉维斯,巴尔。文章还提出了第二个关键问题:除了批评家之外,立陶宛是否有任何真正真实的后现代思想家?本文的主要假设是ArvydasŠliogeris的哲学是立陶宛原始后现代思想的最好的,也许是唯一的例子。它基于立陶宛哲学文化中存在性思想的深厚渊源,并与之相互关联。这些假设的论据如下:首先,Šliogeris是立陶宛第一位尝试以跨学科方式推理的哲学家,例如试图克服哲学与艺术(特别是文学,诗歌和视觉艺术)之间的现代主义区别;其次,Šliogeris的哲学思想对他的著作来说是必不可少的。第三,在德勒兹(Deleuze)认为哲学家是创造者的前提下,人们可以从Šliogeris的方法中看到这一创造性方面。他的文章展示了如何从哲学和诗歌中总结见解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号