...
首页> 外文期刊>Studies in Continuing Education >Neoliberalism, lifelong learning, and the homeplace: problematizing the boundaries of 'public' and 'private' to explore women's learning experiences
【24h】

Neoliberalism, lifelong learning, and the homeplace: problematizing the boundaries of 'public' and 'private' to explore women's learning experiences

机译:新自由主义,终身学习和家园:通过质疑“公共”和“私人”的界限来探索女性的学习经历

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper develops a critical feminist theoretical analysis of the significance of the homeplace in explaining the experiences of adult women learners. It argues that current discourses in lifelong learning are shaped by neoliberal influences that emphasize individualism, competition, and connections to the marketplace. Critical educators, drawing upon a Habermasian analysis, make some valid critiques of problems with developing an educational agenda shaped by neoliberal values, but their assessment is insufficient for explaining the persistence of gender inequalities within adult education. This is because critical theory does not adequately take up other 'medias' of power, such as patriarchy. A feminist lens is used to explore and complicate the perceptual divisions between the 'public' and 'private' spheres through an examination of three focal points in the homeplace; identity, relationships, and labour. Drawing upon a social science and humanities (SSHRC) research study that looks at women's learning trajectories in Canada, and a Canadian Council on Learning (CCL) grant on women and active citizenship, examples are brought in to support the discussion. From this analysis, recommendations are made for educators, administrators, and policy makers to challenge a neoliberal agenda in lifelong learning and develop a more holistic and gender inclusive approach that troubles commonly accepted parameters of 'public' and 'private' by exploring the significance of the homeplace on adult learning experiences.
机译:本文对女权主义在解释成年女性学习者经历中的意义进行了批判的女权主义理论分析。它认为,终身学习的当前话语是由强调个人主义,竞争和与市场的联系的新自由主义影响所塑造的。批判性教育者利用哈贝马斯分析,对发展由新自由主义价值观塑造的教育议程提出了一些有效的批评,但他们的评估不足以解释成人教育中性别不平等的持续存在。这是因为批判理论没有充分吸收父权制之类的其他“权力媒介”。通过检查家中的三个焦点,使用女权主义的镜头来探索并使“公共”和“私人”领域之间的感官划分复杂化;身份,人际关系和劳动。借鉴社会科学和人文科学(SSHRC)的研究成果,该研究考察了加拿大妇女的学习轨迹,并获得了加拿大学习理事会(CCL)授予的关于妇女和积极公民身份的资助,以举例说明该讨论。通过这种分析,提出了一些建议,建议教育者,管理者和政策制定者挑战终身学习中的新自由主义议程,并开发一种更全面和包容性别的方法,通过探索“公共”和“私人”的普遍接受参数来解决这些问题。成人学习经历的家园。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号