首页> 外文期刊>Studies in Conflict & Terrorism >Terrorism and Terrorist Leaders: Insights from Developmental and Ecological Psychology
【24h】

Terrorism and Terrorist Leaders: Insights from Developmental and Ecological Psychology

机译:恐怖主义与恐怖主义领袖:发展与生态心理学的见解

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A recent increase in terrorist actions where the terrorist's death is planned and intentional has raised interest in the psychological functioning, motivation, and reasoning of those who engage in terrorism and those who support it. No consensus exists among Western1 psychologists regarding terrorists who plan to die in their attack, and no Western psychological perspective has thus far contributed substantively to explaining or predicting it. Although most agree that groups engaging in such actions typically have a wider network of support, the psychology of supporters is also unexplained. This article proposes a developmental psychological model of the conditions that favor focused terrorist actions that have publicly discernible goals ascribed to a political or religious cause. The article describes a common pattern of cognitive complexity among terrorist leaders, using Osama bin Laden as a model, where entrenched cognitive simplicity in one key ideological domain (religious or political) is coupled with behavior reflecting the capacity for far greater complexity in other domains (organizational skills, planning, problem-solving.) This pattern, in specifiable historical and ecological context, makes terrorist tactics, including those in which the attacker intentionally dies, more likely, and increases the challenges associated with attempts at diplomacy or negotiated peace.
机译:最近计划并有计划地杀害恐怖主义者的恐怖行动有所增加,这引起了人们对参与恐怖主义者和支持恐怖主义者的心理功能,动机和推理的兴趣。西方 1 心理学家对计划在袭击中丧生的恐怖分子没有共识,迄今为止,西方的心理学观点都没有为解释或预测做出实质性贡献。尽管大多数人都认为参与此类行动​​的团体通常拥有更广泛的支持网络,但支持者的心理也无法解释。本文提出了一种发展心理模型,该模型支持有利于重点恐怖行动的条件,这些恐怖行动的政治或宗教原因具有可公开识别的目标。文章以乌萨马·本·拉丹(Osama bin Laden)为模型,描述了恐怖分子领导人之间普遍的认知复杂性模式,其中一个关键思想领域(宗教或政治)中根深蒂固的认知简单性与反映出在其他领域中具有更大复杂性的能力的行为(组织的技能,计划,解决问题的能力。)在特定的历史和生态背景下,这种模式使恐怖分子的战术(包括攻击者有意死亡的策略)更有可能出现,并增加了与尝试进行外交或谈判达成和平有关的挑战。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Studies in Conflict & Terrorism》 |2008年第3期|227-250|共24页
  • 作者单位

    Social Sciences Division, Endicott College, Beverly, Massachusetts, USA;

    Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Department of Psychiatry, Boston, Massachusetts, USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号