首页> 外文期刊>Studies in Comparative International Development (SCID) >Regime Responsiveness to Basic Needs: a Dimensional Approach
【24h】

Regime Responsiveness to Basic Needs: a Dimensional Approach

机译:政权对基本需求的回应:一种维度方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Despite a considerable amount of research over the last three decades, an unequivocal conclusion regarding democracy's impact on social outcomes has not been reached. This paper attempts to enhance understanding of the impact of political regimes on social outcomes by applying a dimensional approach. Unlike previous studies, which have focused on the overall effect of democracy, this paper separates the dimension of elite competition from the dimension of popular participation and tests their relative effects on the satisfaction of basic needs. Cross-national statistical tests demonstrate that effective participation has a positive effect on need satisfaction, whereas excessive competition has a negative impact. Theoretical explanations of these different impacts are provided. It is argued that the best way to understand the relationship between democracy and social outcomes is to realize that democracy's overall effect might conceal the existence of opposing effects of its component parts. This finding suggests more nuanced ways of reforming political systems that bypass the possible trade-off between democratization and social development.
机译:尽管在过去的三十年中进行了大量的研究,但尚未得出关于民主对社会成果的影响的明确结论。本文试图通过运用维度方法来增强对政治制度对社会成果影响的理解。与以往的研究集中在民主的总体效果上不同,本文将精英竞争的范畴与民众参与的范畴分开,并测试其对基本需求满足的相对影响。跨国统计测试表明,有效参与对需求满足有积极影响,而过度竞争则有不利影响。提供了这些不同影响的理论解释。有人认为,理解民主与社会结果之间关系的最好方法是认识到民主的总体效果可能掩盖了其组成部分的对立效果。这一发现表明,在政治体制改革方面采取了更为细致入微的方式,从而绕开了民主化与社会发展之间可能的取舍。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号